ShareThis Page

Carlynton boys soccer's season comes to end

| Wednesday, Oct. 31, 2012, 8:57 p.m.
Mason Herlihy, right and the Carlynton boys soccer team were unable to knock off Sewickley Academy in the Class AA quarterfinal last week. Randy Jarosz | for the Signal Item
Signal Item
Mason Herlihy, right and the Carlynton boys soccer team were unable to knock off Sewickley Academy in the Class AA quarterfinal last week. Randy Jarosz | for the Signal Item

Carlynton's 2-1 shootout win over Vincentian Academy last week was the exclamation point on an impressive season.

After finishing the 2011 season with one win, the Cougars roared back and finished the 2012 regular season with 12 wins. The team used a 7-1-1 streak to end the season and clinch a playoff spot.

That streak included a victory over Seton-La Salle, a team Carlynton had lost against seven straight times. And the squad advanced to the quarterfinals for the first time since 2007.

Unfortunately for the Cougars, they had to face undefeated and top-seeded Sewickley Academy in the quarterfinals. Carlynton fell to the Panthers, 4-0.

“It definitely wasn't the draw we wanted,” Carlynton coach Charlie Dagnal said. “Overall, we looked tired. I think the Vincentian game took a lot out of us. I don't want to make excuses though. Sewickley Academy is a good team.”

The Cougars seemed to have no answer for the stifling Panthers defense.

“They have smart individual players,” Dagnal said. “They have a lot of guys who play club year round. Their midfield is very talented. All we could do was kick the ball up field. Since we couldn't keep possession, they would bring it right back down.”

The win was the ninth straight game Sewickley Academy held an opponent without a goal and the 15th time this season.

Carlynton's 2-1 win over Vincentian Academy in the opening round of the playoffs was highlighted by the strong performance of senior goalkeeper Phil Meighan.

The Royals scored one minute into play as senior Alec Costa found the net. But Carlynton responded late in the first half as Peter Muszalski scored off of a free kick by Ted Ford.

The squads battled to a standstill in the second half and two overtime periods, sending the game into a best-of-five shootout.

The Cougars went into their final shooter up, 3-2, after Mason Herlihy, Emanual Burton and Grant Schuler all scored.

The final kick came down to Meighan, who had been in goal for Carlynton all night, and he sent the ball into the back of the net past the outstretched arms of goalkeeper Michael Falgione.

“I am proud of the guys,” Dagnal said. “They could have easily went into a shell after that first goal. They have never won a playoff game. The only experience they have were the seniors during their freshman season.

“They didn't give up.”

It was that attitude that helped get the team into the postseason. Dagnal gave credit to his players for believing in the team and playing to their fullest when the squad faced doubters.

“I think the major thing this team, and especially the seniors, can hang their hat on is they didn't lay down,” Dagnal said. “They have been the underdog all season. People outside of maybe the coaches and players thought it was a fluke and didn't give us much of a chance to do well.

“The players didn't give up. And they helped start to get Carlynton soccer back on track.”

Nathan Smith is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at or 412-388-5813.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.