Pine-Richland Rams bow out of WPIAL; PIAA title chase
TribLIVE Sports Videos
The Pine-Richland boys soccer team tore through the regular season, dropping only one virtually meaningless game after the section title was already safely tucked beneath their belt.
The Rams then focused on the playoffs and continued to dominate. A 4-0 win over Norwin was followed up by a thrilling, 2-1 shootout win over Kiski.
But then came Upper St. Clair, which defeated Pine-Richland, 2-1 in the WPIAL Class AAA semifinals
The Rams were taking care of business against defending WPIAL champions, heading to the half tied at 1-1.
Robbie Merz drew first blood for Upper St. Clair with a goal, but Victor Osio answered for the Rams off an assist from Mike Jones.
“It was a chess match,” Pine-Richland coach Jon Conner said. “They came at us pretty good in the midfield, but I feel we held our own.”
The Rams kept the Panthers at bay until the 73rd minute, when Upper St. Clair's Ethan Dysert scored. Dysert's goal came after an injury forced midfielder Pat Sullivan from the game, a situation Conner said was costly for the Rams.
“That goal was a direct result of Pat being out,” Conner said. “That is the kind of thing he usually sweeps up.
“I give Upper St. Clair all the credit in the world. We absorbed a lot of pressure and they just came at us.”
The loss put the Rams in the consolation bracket, where the team lost to Peters Township, 1-0.
Although the Rams fell just short of two of the goals the team set fourth at the beginning of the season, it came away with a section championship and a record of 18-3.
The Rams built a 15-game winning streak to start the season and allowed only 8 goals all season, while scoring 34.
The Rams will graduate several talented seniors and the underclassmen will now look to next year.
Jerry Clark is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-779-6979 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.