Mars wins third straight WPIAL girls soccer title
Mars practiced for shootout situations since the beginning of the season.
Until Saturday night, the Planets didn't need those skills, but the work eventually paid off in gold.
All six Mars shooters tallied goals, with junior Karli Paracca burying the game-winner, as the Planets (19-1-1) won their third straight Class AA championship with a 2-1 shootout victory over Moon.
“Six people stepped up for us today,” Mars coach Blair Gerlach said. “My theory on penalty kicks is if someone feels confident they can make it, let them step up and make it.”
WPIAL rules call for five shooters in shootout situations, but all five players for both sides scored. Mars goalkeeper Sarah Dailey dived to stop Moon's sixth shooter, Taylor Dornin, and Paracca made sure the opportunity didn't go to waste.
Mars extended its perfect record against WPIAL Class AA teams since joining the classification in 2010.
Of course, Moon is no ordinary Class AA team, as the Tigers moved down to the classification prior to the season and played evenly with the Planets.
“We had a couple of chances, (and) we didn't put a ball away,” Moon coach Bill Pfeifer said. “I'm proud of the way the kids played — they battled to the end.”
Moon (20-2) scored in the fifth minute when senior midfielder Christine Barthen booted a free kick from 30 yards into the top of the goal.
With just under 16 minutes remaining, Mars tied the game when Paracca slipped behind the Moon defense, took a crossing pass from Sabrina Edwards and slipped the ball past Moon goalie Nicole Falcione.
Doug Gulasy is a staff writer for the Tribune-Review.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.