Share This Page

Sewickley Academy boys cap season as PIAA runners-up

| Wednesday, Nov. 21, 2012, 12:01 a.m.
Sewickley Herald
Sewickley Academy freshman Matt Teitelbaum controls the ball during a scrimmage against Bishop Canevin at Nichols Field on Wednesday, Aug. 29, 2012. Kristina Serafini | Sewickley Herald

The Sewickley Academy boys soccer team's season ended in gut-wrenching fashion.

Mountain View's Austin Mack scored a goal in the 52nd minute, and the Eagles' defense held the Panthers off the scoreboard in a 1-0 victory in the PIAA championship game Friday night at Hersheypark Stadium.

“Their coach did a nice job in the defensive manner (with) the way he set up his team,” Sewickley Academy coach James Boone said. “They were strong from defense to midfield to up top. Our team played very well. Obviously, it was a 1-0 game, (and) it was unfortunate that it came up the wrong side. But I was very happy with both sides.”

To beat Sewickley Academy, Mountain View accomplished what just one other team had all season: shut the Panthers out.

Sewickley Academy (21-2-1) scored 81 goals in the first 23 games of the season, about 3.5 per game. The Panthers' only other scoreless outing came in a 0-0 tie Oct. 6 against Quaker Valley, and they entered the final coming off a 3-0 victory over Biglerville in the semifinals.

However, Mountain View shut down the Sewickley Academy attack by leaving five defenders back at all times and limiting the Panthers' space in the offensive zone.

“They played a strong defensive game,” Boone said. “Their players in the back were very good, (and) they're well-organized. They didn't have any mistakes, which in that kind of game you're hoping they make one or two mistakes so you can capitalize. But they didn't, and I give them a lot of credit.”

After Mack scored off a backdoor pass, the Eagles clamped down even further defensively, but the Panthers nearly got a tying goal. Mountain View keeper Bobby Pfahl robbed Sewickley Academy senior Jake Mulholland with about 11 minutes remaining, leaping to his left to snare Mulholland's shot headed for the upper right corner of the net.

That save proved to be the difference, as it proved to be the Panthers' best chance at tying the game.

“I was watching (the game) on DVR (Saturday), and if he doesn't make that save, it's a goal and it's 1-1,” Boone said. “That's going to change the complexion of that game, maybe give us some momentum that we needed. But the goalie made a great save, and I applaud him.”

Boone said the players were “crushed” to have come so far only to lose in the final game, but they recovered by the time the team returned home that night.

“It hurts, but they bounced back pretty good,” he said. “Take it in stride — we did everything we could do to win that game, and unfortunately we came up short.”

The Panthers will lose several seniors to graduation, including all four captains.

Boone, who became a coach at the same time those seniors entered high school, said it would be difficult to replace their leadership. But he expects the experienced junior class, led by such players as Stevie Munn, J.P. Bowell, Keegan MacDougal, Jack Matten and Anthony Stinson, to step up and fill that leadership role.

The coach also thinks Friday's loss will serve as motivation for the Panthers next season.

“They had it right in their fingertips, and unfortunately, we let it slip through them,” he said. “We're always looking for the three goals. (First), win the section, which we did. (Second), WPIALs slipped through our fingers, too; that'll be a motivating factor of getting back to the WPIAL championship game. And obviously (third) is the state.

“I think that will definitely motivate the team to at least repeat (as section champs) and hopefully get farther and win a couple of championships.”

Doug Gulasy is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at dgulasy@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.