Share This Page

Fox Chapel girls soccer eyes successful season

| Wednesday, Aug. 21, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Plum's Aaliyah Odom (No. #23) and Fox Chapel's Sarah Friedland (No. 11) compete for the ball during the soccer game at Fox Chapel High School on Monday, Oct. 1, 2012. Erica Hilliard | Valley News Dispatch
Fox Chapel's Lauren Kelly (No. 13) keeps an eye on the ball against Allderdice's Mikiala Hoffman (No. 26) during the soccer game at Fox Chapel High School on Tuesday, Sept. 25, 2012. Erica Hilliard | Valley News Dispatch

The Fox Chapel Area High School girls soccer team had a 16-2 record overall and went 10-2 in the section last season.

Coach Erik Duffy is looking for another great campaign and hopes the Foxes can make some inroads in the playoffs.

“We lost two senior starters but we have eight returning starters and four of them were all-section performers last year,” Duffy said. “One of our areas of concern is replacing the great scoring ability of Jessie Thiessen.”

The Foxes will return seniors Sarah Friedland (defender), Janelle DeBaldo (defender), Theresa Scheiffarth (defender) and Lauren Kelly (midfield).

Kelly was chosen to the All-WPIAL team last year.

Joining them will be returning starters Genna Kasian, a junior defender, and sophomores Elayna Burdelski (goalkeeper), Alexis Schwartz (defender), and Taylor Cohen (midfielder).

“We will be solid defensively,” Duffy said. “We've got a lot of experience and leadership.

“There are a lot of strong teams in the section and we should be in the playoff battle again.”

Marty Stewart is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-782-2123 or mstewart@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.