Healthy Vincentian girls soccer team ready for 2013
There is reason for optimism for the Vincentian Lady Royals soccer team in 2013. A series of injuries put the team in a tough spot a season ago, and with a new season comes a fresh and healthy start.
A core of seniors will lead the way for coach Marko Vujicic and perhaps none is more important than goalie Molly Robinson. Rachel McNulty is a great scorer, Vujicic said, and Mckenzy Santos also will be back to help.
The midfield is young, but Vujicic said he has seen a lot of good things in camp. The group is heavy on youth with Samantha Potter and Keeley Aiken teaming up with sophomore Hanna Canil. Olivia Horgan, a sophomore who saw playing time a year ago, will be joined by another freshman in Kailee Koryak, who like the other freshmen, the coach will be expecting great things from.
“One of the things I like is that we are solid in all aspects of the field,” Vujicic said. “All of our players are good.”
Another thing the coach likes about his young squad is the team spirit and closeness of the group both on and off the field.
“They play together and hang out in and out of school,” he said. “They are really dedicated.”
The rash of injuries that derailed the season last year may pay dividends now. Many players got experience and came back ready to play.
“Only 11 can start, but all of them can come in and play, and all of them will give 110 percent when they are in there,” Vujicic said. “I was amazed how many kids stepped up last year and it is that fight and desire that got them to this point.”
The Lady Royals have a big game coming up on Sept. 9 at Highmark Stadium, the home of the Pittsburgh Riverhounds. Vincentian will take on rival Avonworth at 7 p.m.
Jerry Clark is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-779-6979 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.