New coach preaches familiar message for success at Vincentian
There is a changing of the guard for the Vincentian Royals soccer program, as Mich Rihele has stepped aside and former assistant Mike Haberman will take control of the program along with assistant Rich Kearney.
Haberman played soccer for Fox Chapel and grew into coaching for Arsenal, the Northstars and a North Allegheny club team.
Although the majority of his coaching experience came on the girls side, Haberman is excited for the opportunity at Vincentian, and his possession style should work well with his new team.
“We try to keep the ball moving and tire the other team out,” Haberman said.
David Rivetti is an attacker in the midfield and he will be an important player this season.
Another player who will be instrumental is Rege Kearney, a center back, and Patrick Donnelly, who will man the left midfield and outside back.
“Rege, David and Patrick are my senior captains,” Haberman said.
“The seniors will lead the way, but the underclassmen will do their part, as well.
Junior captain Alex Madonna and Norm Gottschalk also will factor into the game plan, and the team will rely on the 12 freshmen.
“Our goal is to go further than last year,” Haberman said. “Win the section and WPIAL … I will count on my captains and drive myself to get the best out of the kids.
“I told them that if they don't dream big, they will never get to the ultimate goal.”
Haberman said the effort has been outstanding thus far and the team has to remember that this is a team sport and that there are no stars on the roster.
“We need 11 guys pulling in the same direction,” he said.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.