Shaler boys soccer team returns leading scorer
The Shaler boys soccer team is hoping last year's struggles can be put to good use this season.
The team returns seven starters, three of which are defenders.
Shaler coach Nick Russo will be counting on returning players Nick Polito a three-year starter and leading scorer, Ryan Landry, Justin Landry, Scott Stuthers, John Colarusso, Noah Elamin and Justin Duffy.
“We have about five guys who have some experience who didn't start last year and a couple of nice freshmen, too,” Russo said. “I am pretty excited about what we have coming back, and a bunch of good kids who work hard. They are coachable and I think we can compete.”
The game that highlighted last season was an upset win over section champion Pine-Richland. That win proved the Titans could have a bright future.
“Last year was a long one and my first as a head coach,” Russo said. “We got things going and finally figured things out late in the season. The Pine-Richland win was huge.”
The Titans lost seven games in the final three minutes last season, and Russo said that winning half of those close games would have made a difference.
“We have got to be mentally tougher (to pull those games out),” he said.
Another positive according to the coach is the leadership that returns.
“We have four returning seniors and our leading scorer is back as a sophomore,” Russo said. “We will be more productive and I can not wait to see how this all will fit together.”
Jerry Clark is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-779-6979 or email@example.com .
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.