Hampton boys soccer team ready to begin road back to playoffs
Uncharted territory is where the Hampton boys varsity soccer team ended up at the end of the regular season in 2012 … not in the playoffs.
The perennial powerhouse was forced to sit at home in the playoffs for the first time in a long time, and although the team only missed out by one game, the team took no solace in being close.
That miss is the fule for this season.
“We have quite a few players back and that missing the playoffs was a wake up call,” said Chuck Kelley, Hampton head coach. “We have depth at different positions, we have some new faces at different positions and we will have to work hard for 80 minutes.”
The talent begins with the return of Steve Margaria, a solid player who missed the season last year with an injury.
“He will be a big factor,” Kelley said.
“Senior David Schellin is a starting defender who brings a good bit of leadership and Kelley calls him the backbone of the defense.
Schellin will be joined Karl Palmer in the backfield. Palmer can play different positions which will help the team out.
Goalie Matt Williams is a second-year starter and another important player for the Talbots.
Much of the rest of the team is made up of juniors, in what will be a junior-heavy team.
Last year, a lot of younger players stepped up and will be back with more experience and more motivation that never before.
“We have a lot of balance and versatility,” Kelly said. “It won't be one guy winning us games. Everyone will play a big role this season.”
Kelley said that in a section with North Allegheny, Pine-Richland and Seneca Valley among others, there are no easy games and there won't be any blowouts.
Jerry Clark is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-779-6979 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.