ShareThis Page

Coaching change not slowing down Bishop Canevin girls soccer

| Wednesday, Sept. 18, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Bailey Burgess and the Bishop Canevin girls soccer team have outscored opponents 17-1 so far this season.
Randy Jarosz | for the Signal Item
Bailey Burgess and the Bishop Canevin girls soccer team have outscored opponents 17-1 so far this season.

When a coach takes over a program, it may take a couple of games to get on the same page.

If the Bishop Canevin girls soccer team and first-year coach Jared Steigerwald are going through a transition period, the rest of Class A in the WPIAL had better watch out.

The Crusaders have opened the season with a 6-0 mark — including three wins in Section 3-A.

“I knew we would be a younger team with talent,” Steigerwald said. “So expectations were high when we started the year. All the girls are goal driven. They have high expectations for themselves and their teammates.

“They expect to win and will do whatever it takes.”

The team had its stiffest challenge of the year so far last week as it defeated South Allegheny, 2-1, in double overtime. The Crusaders took a 1-0 lead in the first half off a goal from senior Julianne Hart with an assist from senior Carrie Bunevich.

The Gladiators pulled even when a Gladiators corner kick was relayed past the hands of goalkeeper Caroline Clarke.

“I think giving up a goal in the 72nd minute after four 80-minute games and a 90-minute game is pretty good,” Steigerwald said. “She had five straight shutouts. Our defenders are pretty good, but when (Clarke) has seen shots, she has made big saves.”

Bishop Canevin was able to pull out the win late in the second overtime period when Amy Calabrese found the goal off an assist from junior Bailey Burgess.

“It was a little disappointing when they scored,” Hart said. “But we're happy we were able to come back in the second overtime.”

The win over South Allegheny was a measuring stick for the Crusaders. The Gladiators made the WPIAL playoffs last season and entered this week tied atop Section 2-A with Bentworth.

“It proves to the rest of the league we are a team to watch out for,” senior Becca Vanek said.

While the seniors of the team admitted they were skeptical of a coaching change entering their final year, the five veterans have embraced Steigerwald and his style of play.

“(Steigerwald) has been great,” senior Alaina McGuire said. “He has gotten us more focused. Our focus is much better than it was last year. We want to win.”

Steigerwald's biggest gripe about his team is that it doesn't make the most of its opportunities. The offense has been effective, scoring 17 goals, but the first-year coach thinks it should be more.

“Through the first five games, we outshot our opponents, 134-11,” he said. “I wouldn't say I am disappointed, but we need to make more of our opportunities. Sometimes we let games be closer than it should be.”

But a 6-0 record isn't anything to scoff at. The Crusaders said they have room to get better as they seek to defend their Section 3-A title.

“The section is pretty good, so that will be a challenge,” Hart said. “It is always good to play good teams.”

“We plan on winning the section again,” McGuire said. “After that, we want to go somewhere in playoffs.”

Nathan Smith is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @NSmith_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.