Shady Side Acacdemy girls soccer team seeks to continue winning ways
SSA Maggie Scott moves ball down field during varsity game against Springdale on Saturday, Oct. 6, 2012.
Photo by Jan Pakler | for The Herald
The Shady Side Academy girls soccer team has a new coach but nothing much has changed as the Indians have continued their winning ways.
Their only loss so far was a non-section contest against Fox Chapel.
New coach Mary Lynch was an assistant at SSA for the past three years, so she was aware of what the squad is capable of.
“I didn't have to come in and make any sweeping changes.,” she said. “There are a few minor things that we're doing differently and so far things have been going well.”
As was the case for the past three years, high-scoring Maggie Scott has been leading the offense.
Scott, who entered the season as SSA's all-time scoring leader, has already scored 10 goals this season.
She is ably supported by an array of talented returning starters.
“Even though we lost four seniors, three of whom were starters, we have a lot of returning starters and a large senior class,” Lynch said. “That is a strength of this year's team — the leadership and experience.”
Senior Olivia Cochran returns in goal along with senior midfielder Zoe Schoen, junior defenders Kara Pooley and Tori Winter and junior midfielders Casey Holshue and Courtney Clark. Freshman defender Eliza Cochran will also see playing time.
Lynch expects Greensburg Central Catholic and Springdale to be strong once again.
“They always have good teams and we should be right up there, also,” Lynch said. “We have a strong work ethic and the leadership of our seniors has had a strong trickle down effect on the younger players.”
Marty Stewart is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-782-2123 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.