HS notes: Top-notch matches set for Peters Township tournament
Top-notch matches set at Peters Twp.
One of the season's most highly regarded events, the annual Peters Township Soccer Tournament, is this Friday and Saturday.
Mercyhurst Prep will play Seneca Valley at 6 p.m. on the opening night, followed by the second-ranked Indians and South Park at 8.
The next day, Mercyhurst Prep and South Park will kick off at 1 p.m., then Peters Township and Seneca Valley at 3.
Expect some emotions for the final game: Peters Township toppled the Raiders, 2-1, to win the WPIAL Class AAA title last year on Veronica Latsko's header with 27 seconds to go in double overtime.
Latsko, a Virginia recruit, is out for the season with a torn ACL.
• Penn-Trafford's 2-0 upset win Monday over previously top-ranked Norwin might've come as a shock, but it's not likely to drastically alter the Section 1-AAA standings. Halfway through section play, the Warriors are in first place at 6-0. Norwin is in second at 4-1 and closes out its first half Friday with a match at Kiski Area (3-4-1). The next four teams — Latrobe, Kiski Area, Franklin Regional and Hempfield — all had two wins entering Tuesday's games. Norwin won the Section 1-AAA title last year.
• Yough has enjoyed a 6-2, 4-1 start despite not having last year's WPIAL leader in goals, sophomore Mikayla Mance, who's playing for the Riverhounds Development Academy, and junior Hannah Ponitz, who's out for the year with a torn ACL. Yough's only section loss came Monday — 2-1 at Southmoreland — but the Cougars have a chance for redemption next Monday when they host Section 1-AA leader Mt. Pleasant (6-4, 5-1).
— Jason Mackey
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.