Goalie doubles as scorer for Kiski
Kiski Area's boys soccer team lost a key scoring threat when junior forward Zach Wilson went down with an ACL injury this summer.
Coach Bob Wright worried about how to fill the void.
He found the solution in the form of a goalkeeper.
Junior Matt Bisceglia transferred back to Kiski Area after attending Central Catholic, where he started in net. The Cavaliers had Brandon Smail, a senior All-WPIAL selection, back at goalkeeper, and they considered Bisceglia too skilled with the ball to waste him as a strict backup, so they moved Bisceglia out to the field.
Given a couple weeks to adjust, Bisceglia, who primarily starts at defense, has added to Kiski Area's goal production. He scored in a 2-1 win over Franklin Regional on Sept. 17 and in a 6-1 win over Latrobe two days later.
“We all knew that he was a pretty good goalie, but I don't think any of us knew he was that good of a field player,” senior Matt Dziadosz said.
• When Deer Lakes' boys soccer team meets Shady Side Academy for a rematch Oct. 10, it'll have the chance to stun Section 2-AA's favorite in front of the downtown crowd. The Lancers and Indians will play at Highmark Stadium at 7:30 p.m. Oct. 10. Shady Side Academy beat Deer Lakes, 4-1, when the teams met Saturday.
• With four straight Section 2-A wins, Riverview's boys team shook off its early-season rust and stands a chance to claim at least a share of the section title. The Raiders last won hardware in 2000.
• Burrell and Valley's boys teams' first Section 1-A game has been rescheduled to 2 p.m. Oct. 5.
— Bill West
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.