A dispute over officiating and sportsmanship prompted Brashear boys soccer coach Abby Phillips to yank her team off the field 14 minutes, 27 seconds into Tuesday's Section 5-AAA contest at Canon-McMillan.
The Big Macs led, 4-0, at the time.
Phillips claimed the officiating crew “did not know the rules of soccer” and said, “We just had enough disrespect from the referees.”
At least three yellow cards were given to Brashear, including one on Phillips for her players wearing jewelry.
While insisting she was carrying out the wishes of the players and their parents, Phillips also cited, “the mockery, the disrespect, the things coming out of the Canon-Mac players' mouths directed at my players,” as reasons for the forfeit.
Canon-McMillan coach Larry Fingers denied such claims, and Big Macs athletic director Guy Montecalvo expressed frustration at Brashear storming off.
“We pay a lot of people,” Big Macs athletic director Guy Montecalvo said. “We pay a couple hundred dollars for the ambulance. Several hundred dollars for two police officers there for all of our boys games. All of my workers. To play 14 and a half minutes of play … concession stand people don't make the money they anticipated. It was frustrating. And the kids are denied the opportunity to compete.”
Montecalvo reported the incident to WPIAL executive director Tim O'Malley Tuesday evening. He said he spoke with the officials' assigner and members of the crew would filing reports.
Phillips said she notified Pittsburgh City League athletic director Mike Gavlik.
Jason Mackey is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @Mackey_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.