South Fayette allows 1st goal
When South Fayette allowed its first goal of the season during a 1-0 loss to Quaker Valley on Saturday, the Lions reacted with little more than a collective shrug.
“We viewed it as a monkey off our backs,” coach Rob Eldridge said. “It would've been nice to walk out with a 1-1 tie or a 2-1 victory, but, honestly, we didn't want to take that clean sheet into the (WPIAL) tournament.”
South Fayette, which played at Class A No. 1 Seton-La Salle on Monday, won its first 11 games by a combined score of 42-0. The Lions also had a scoreless tie against Class AA No. 1 West Allegheny.
Senior Alex Gedrys, a 2012 All-WPIAL performer, and junior Andrew Pine rotate at goalkeeper.
Seniors Dan Pruss and Evan Yee have carried the South Fayette (11-1-1, 7-1-1) back line, in addition to junior Nick McKee, a central midfielder who shifted back because of a hamstring injury to Travis Revay. Junior forward Brian Coyne leads the offense with 13 goals.
• Brothers Tyler and Aaron Harris lead the McGuffey (10-3, 8-1) offense with 18 goals apiece. Tyler Harris, who shifted into a midfield position this season, has added 11 assists, Aaron eight. “It's a family affair down here,” Highlanders coach Jim Kita said. Junior defender Luke Desmond, a cousin of the Harris brothers, routinely marks the opponent's top player.
• Monday was the deadline for five individuals to submit information on last week's Brashear-at-Canon-McMillan boys soccer forfeit. The WPIAL Executive Committee will review the event Oct. 15. Any action would come, at the earliest, when the Board of Control meets Oct. 21.
— Jason Mackey
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.