ShareThis Page

South Fayette boys soccer continues dominating on defense

| Friday, Oct. 4, 2013, 2:30 p.m.
Dan Pruss and the South Fayette soccer team has outscored opponents 52-1.
Randy Jarosz | for the Bridgeville Area News
Dan Pruss and the South Fayette soccer team has outscored opponents 52-1.

No team ever wants to lose a game.

But a loss by the South Fayette boys soccer team helped get a monkey off its back.

After starting the season 11-0-1, the Lions dropped a 1-0 decision to Quaker Valley. Not only was it South Fayette's first loss, but it was the Lions first – and only – goal allowed this season.

“I prepared the kids and told them it was unlikely they wouldn't give up a goal all season,” South Fayette coach Rob Eldridge said. “Obviously, a tie or a 2-1 win would have been better than a loss. What I was most impressed by is how we responded coming out of that game.”

The Lions followed the loss with wins over Seton-La Salle, 4-0, and Obama Academy, 6-0, last week. In all, South Fayette has outscored its opponents 52-1.

The defensive success isn't a shock to anyone on the team. The team returned seven starters from a squad that made a run to the WPIAL Class AA consolation game last season, including senior defenders Evan Yee and Dan Pruss and senior goalkeeper Alex Gedrys, who was an All-WPIAL selection.

Junior Nick McKee has shifted back because of a hamstring injury to Travis Revay. Junior George Slater has also contributed to the defensive pressure.

The team has worked a second goalkeeper – junior Andrew Pine – as a procautionary step.

“It has been a really good thing,” Gedrys said. “Now in case there is an injury along the way, we have someone who can step in line.”

The chemistry on the field has been big factor in the team's success. Many of the defensive starters have been in the spot since they were underclassmen.

The team took its bumps during a three-win season in 2011 but the dividends are now paying off.

“If someone told me before the season at the end of 15 games we would have one goal against us, I would've chuckled,” Eldridge said. “But at the end of last year, we were putting together some nice defensive performances. We think this is a continuation of that, just a more mature version.”

The Lions reached the WPIAL Class AA semifinals before falling to Quaker Valley, 1-0, in double overtime. South Fayette then lost to Belle Vernon, 1-0, in the consolation game.

Experiences like those have prepared the team for this season.

“It helps a lot,” Pruss said. “We all know each other and have played together for years. We have a good chemistry.

“And we know if we don't let the other team score, they can't win.”

That mentality has pushed the Lions (8-1-1) to the top of the Section 5-AA standings. The team trails only West Allegheny (8-0-1) with one game remaining in the series this season – 7:30 tonight, Thursday, at West Allegheny. The Lions lead Quaker Valley (7-3) and Montour (5-5).

Even with a playoff berth secured, the Lions are not looking to let up anytime soon. They still have a chance at a section title and the team wants to improve heading into the postseason.

That may be the scariest thing about South Fayette – Eldridge thinks his team can get better.

“I honestly don't think we are playing our best soccer,” Eldridge said. “That is still ahead of us. We are getting better every day.

“Every day we go into training, we want to walk off the field looking at each other and saying we got better as a team.”

Nathan Smith is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @NSmith_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.