All-Kiski Valley soccer notebook: Burrell girls stay unbeaten in October
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Burrell girls stay unbeaten in October
Of the WPIAL girls soccer teams who missed the playoffs, arguably none had a better October than Burrell.
The Bucs (11-7, 8-6 in Section 2-AA) finished with a winning overall record for the first time since 2007. Essential to that feat was a six-game win streak that stretched from Sept. 30 to the end of the year.
That late-season success might serve as a sign of things to come. Only four players graduate.
Junior Bailey Klems returns at goalkeeper, and the defense will include junior Erin Duffey, junior Abigail Nitowski, sophomore Brittany Woodcock and freshman Michela Beattie. Sophomore Tori Slomka and junior Lexi Husar will flank sophomore Anika Ignozzi at midfield, and junior Jennifer Ryan and sophomore Dana McAlpine return as proven scorers at forward.
“With the exception of the two Mars games, we were in every game this year,” coach Chris Harkins said. “I think the girls finally realized they could play with anybody — definitely anybody in our section. I think they really gained confidence and trust in each other.”
• Deer Lakes' boys soccer team will appear in the postseason for the first time since 2003, but the regular-season win that particularly pleased coach Jordan Wiegand had no bearing on playoff hopes. He identified the Lancers' 1-0 win at North Hills on Sept. 7 as a personal highlight. “Going to my alma mater this year and beating them was probably the best feeling I've ever had as a coach,” he said.
• Fox Chapel boys soccer's 13-0 win over Penn Hills Monday marked the first time the Foxes had a double-digit goal total since 2009, when they beat Penn Hills, 11-0.
— Bill West
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.