ShareThis Page

Clinched: Carlynton girls soccer headed to playoffs

| Wednesday, Oct. 16, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Senior defender Courtney Zofcin (right) and the Carlynton girls soccer team clinched a playoff berth for the firs time since 2007 last week.
Randy Jarosz | for the Signal Item
Senior defender Courtney Zofcin (right) and the Carlynton girls soccer team clinched a playoff berth for the firs time since 2007 last week.

Some coaches might be concerned when their first season leading a squad produces only two wins.

But Carlynton girls soccer coach David Zinski knew his team had nowhere to go but up.

“I knew what we had coming back and what we had coming up from the junior high team,” the second-year coach said. “I thought we could be good. My goal was to finish third in the conference but I will take making it to the playoffs.”

The Cougars (8-7-2, 7-6-1) wrapped up a fourth-place finish in Section 3-A last week with a pair of 2-0 wins over Seton-La Salle, which was battling Carlynton for the final WPIAL playoff berth from the section.

“It is amazing,” junior goalkeeper Ricki Rodriguez said. “I saw it was going to be a different season in camp. Everyone showed up and said we want to win this year. Everyone came in and tried their hardest.”

The 2013 season is only the second time in the past decade that the Carlynton girls soccer team reached the playoffs. The last was in 2007 when the Cougars went 10-8 and fell to Beaver, 3-0, in the opening round.

The team's 8-7-2 record is also the only winning record for the program in the past 10 years – and equals the wins of the last five years.

The other playoff-bound teams from Section 3-A include Bishop Canevin (12-1), Avonworth (12-2) and Vincentian Academy (9-3-1).

The season didn't go entirely smooth for the Cougars. The team started the season 2-3-2 as it worked to find a rhythm.

“We kind of gave up in some of the games during the beginning of the year,” junior defender Haley Doherty said. “We still had the loser mentality. We had to work on that.”

Carlynton was able to turn it around to win six of its final 10 games of the season.

The team's increased level of play clearly showed in the final stats. After the team scored only 11 goals in 2012, the Cougars finished with 43 this year.

And after giving up 58 goals last season, the team gave up 31 in 2013.

“They have actually played the game this season,” Zinski said. “They have been able to connect passes and just not play kickball. Instead of just reacting to what is going on they are playing.

“We told them if they do what they are supposed to, there is a good chance we will likely win.”

While there is no guarantee of what the playoffs hold, the jump in play from Carlynton may be a preview of what is to come. The team only loses two seniors – only one which is playing due to injury – and has a good flow of junior high players coming up through the system.

If the team can keep its development going, the loser mentality of the past may become a distant memory.

“They talk about it in practices and teachers ask them about it at school,” Zinski said. “We have gotten more interest from people and they are coming to watch us play.

“That is good for the girls. After getting their butts kicked for a few years, people are noticing the team.”

Nathan Smith is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @NSmith_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.