Baldwin girls clinch section title
The Baldwin girls' varsity soccer team is in the midst of a banner 2013 season.
The Lady Highlanders wrapped up the Section 4-AAA championship with a win against Ringgold earlier this week.
But it was their thrilling 1-0 victory at Bethel Park last week that provided an exclamation point to the regular season.
“The girls won (against Bethel Park) because they played with heart,” said Caley Troutman, Baldwin's first-year head coach. “They set the goal to win the section at the beginning of the season, and they played to win at Bethel.
“They gave everything. The last 10 minutes, the defense and goalie Liz Spegar blocked shot after shot. A few saves were made off the goal line. They were determined to keep the ball out of our net.”
Carly Baumann, a senior forward/center midfielder, netted the game-winning goal off a free kick for the Lady Highlanders, who posted 14 shutouts through 17 games in 2013.
“Defensively, Kelsie Balsam was a huge part of our success (this year),” Troutman said. “She also assisted on Carly Baumann's goal.”
Baldwin and Bethel Park played to a 0-0 stalemate in their first meeting in September.
The Lady Highalnders also defeated and tied Mt. Lebanon, another South Hills rival, by 1-0 and 0-0 scores this season.
“I'm really proud of the team and how they are playing right now,” Troutman said. “We need to keep it going into the playoffs.”
Through 16 games, Amanda Grmusa, a senior midfielder, and Katy Pearson, a senior forward, led the Lady Highlanders in goals scored with 16 and 15, respectively.
Ray Fisher is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at 412-388-5820 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.