Share This Page

Alle-Kiski area sisters bond as they push teams toward WPIAL postseason

| Tuesday, Oct. 15, 2013, 10:12 p.m.
Erica Dietz | Valley News Dispatch
Knoch freshman Allie Gore (left) and her sister, senior Abbey, warm up together before their soccer game against Plum on Monday, Oct. 14, 2013, at Plum High School.

Just after the end of Knoch's 5-0 loss at Mars in girls soccer on Sept. 23, Knights freshman midfielder/defender Allie Gore began to cry.

While the lopsided result against the Butler County rival and perennial WPIAL power upset Gore to some extent, what really bothered the freshman starter was the way some of Mars' girls, whom Gore knew as teammates through the Northern Steel cup organization, no longer seemed friendly when they became opponents.

An older, wiser Gore provided Allie solace.

“I know the emotions and drama that come with it,” said senior defender Abbey Gore, Allie's sister and a four-year starter. “So I remember just standing on the field for a long time, just hugging her and telling her, ‘It's OK.' ”

While teammates who double as friends are emotionally in tune with one another from time to time, there's little doubt that sisters share the deepest bond. Several Alle-Kiski Valley sisters, including the Gores, have helped their teams earn playoff berths and developed lasting memories along the way.

“At the beginning of the season, I wasn't tough,” Allie Gore said.

The younger Gore, though identified as more offensively gifted than her sister, aspires above all else to match Abbey's defensive grit.

“I feel like I'm pretty good, but compared to her, I feel like I'm nowhere as good,” Allie Gore said. “When she goes for a tackle, she goes in 100 percent. She doesn't care about what happens to her.”

Both Gores are big reasons why Knoch (12-5-1, 10-3-1) had nine shutouts. Abbey, one of the team's two center backs, also has three goals and four assists, while Allie, a starter at left back, has one goal and two assists.

Goal-scoring, though not a concern for the Gore girls, was a touchy topic for Freeport's Jack sisters.

Senior sweeper Dava Jack has toiled away on defense, where she stifles breakaways and clears corner kicks. Her twin, Erica Jack, roams the other end of the field as one of two forwards for Freeport (10-7-1, 9-4-1).

Erica Jack scored 25 goals during the regular season, including five in the Yellowjackets' Section 2-AA finale, an 8-1 win over Indiana on Oct. 9. But the goal that mattered most that night to the Jack family came from the foot of Dava, who scored three times as a freshman midfielder and hadn't scored since.

The scoring opportunity came about after Erica and Dava Jack, who are not identical twins but resemble each other, agreed to switch positions mid-play.

“I don't really think our coaches noticed,” Erica Jack said. “And when she scored, she just like fell on the ground because she was so happy. Then I picked her up, and she was crying, and I was crying.”

Added Dava: “I didn't even know how to handle myself. ... Without her, I probably would've lay there all night.”

The Amatos of Plum (14-3, 9-3 in Section 3-AAA) and the DeBaldos of Fox Chapel (16-1-1, 11-0-1 in Section 3-AAA) can sympathize with the Jacks, as they're also sister tandems with polar roles.

Mustangs sophomore midfielder Ashley Amato has 17 goals and five assists, while senior defender Alexis Amato has one of each.

Foxes senior defender Janelle DeBaldo accumulated 15 assists but no goals during the regular season, while freshman midfielder Deena DeBaldo tallied 15 goals and added three assists.

Bill West is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at wwest@tribweb.com or via Twitter @BWest_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.