Penn-Trafford's season ends in playoff shootout
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Penn-Trafford coach Rick Nese didn't wait long when asked whether he considered the 2013 season a success.
“Absolutely,” he said.
The Warriors (12-6) fell short of one of their team goals — advancing to the WPIAL semifinals and giving themselves a chance to win the title — falling, 1-0, in a shootout to Pine-Richland in the first round of the WPIAL Class AAA playoffs Saturday at Norwin High School.
While one goal went unaccomplished, Penn-Trafford achieved several others this season — including winning their third straight Section 1-AAA championship.
“We didn't get into the final four, but everybody you're playing right now is a good team,” Nese said. “So we fell in a penalty-kick shootout to a very good team. I'm proud of the girls. We have a section championship. There's only going to be one team that ends up winning the WPIAL. We've got a section championship to hang our hat on.”
Penn-Trafford (12-6), the No. 7 seed in Class AAA, came out slowly in the first half against Pine-Richland, a team it lost to by a 2-1 score earlier this season.
Nese said he thought nerves played a major role in the early struggles.
“The first 20 minutes or so, our first touch wasn't what it needed to be,” Nese said. “We were chasing a little too much instead of just settling in and playing. I think once that first 20 minutes of the game (were over), the nerves kind of settled in. We played much better, had some more opportunities.
“But at the end of the day, Pine-Richland's going to be one of the final eight teams. There's a reason that they are. They're good.”
Penn-Trafford generated some scoring chances late in the first half and after halftime, but the teams spent much of the game locked in a tightly contested defensive battle. Neither team generated a large amount of scoring chances.
“As we got over our nerves, we got into the attacking third a little bit more,” Nese said. “The goalkeeper, we really didn't test her too much, but she's a quality goaltender. She showed it in the penalty kicks. It's the way it goes.”
Unlike regular-season games, playoff games are decided by a five-person shootout if the contest remains tied after two overtime periods.
Pine-Richland goalkeeper Leah Roth began the shootout by blasting a shot past Penn-Trafford goalkeeper Kayla DiPaolo's diving save attempt. After Kristina Wallace missed high for Penn-Trafford, Katie Graszl scored to put the Rams up, 2-0, in the shootout. Roth stopped Penn-Trafford freshman Athena Biondi's shot, and Maggie Shope put Pine-Richland up 3-0. When Ryley Watt's shot also missed the goal, Pine-Richland emerged with the victory.
“When you lose (the shootout), you don't like it,” Nese said. “But it is what it is. Everybody knows the rules going into the game beforehand, so it's the way it ends.”
Senior Morgan Casario and junior Kristen Swope sat out Saturday's game with injuries, and Beretta injured her knee during the second half.
Nese praised the work of the senior class, including Beretta, Casario, DiPaolo, Kayla Novosel and Michelle Ruoff.
“They're going to be disappointed, and we're going to miss them,” he said.
Doug Gulasy is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at 412-388-5830, via email at email@example.com or via Twitter @dgulasy_Trib.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.