Alex O'Brien's second-half goal lifted No. 6 Yough (15-4-0) to a 1-0 victory against No. 11 Elizabeth Forward (11-4-4) in the WPIAL Class AA first round at Yough. Leigh Appolonia notched six saves in the shutout. Yough will face Moon in the quarterfinals on Wednesday at 8 p.m. at Baldwin.
Canon-McMillan 1, Norwin 0 (shootout) — Abby Gillespie scored the deciding goal as No. 8 seed Canon-McMillan (13-3-3) beat Norwin, 4-2 in penalty kicks in the first round of the WPIAL Class AAA playoffs at Norwin. Kyra Murphy, Sydney Keremes and Alena Poljak also scored for the Big Macs. Micayla Livingston and Sami Farabaugh scored in the shootout for Norwin (14-3-2). Canon-McMillan will play No. 1 Seneca Valley on Wednesday.
Shady Side Academy 8, Serra 0 — Maggie Scott scored four goals and Zoe Schoen added two goals and an assist as No. 3 Shady Side Academy (15-3-0) blanked No. 14 Serra (10-8-0) in the first round of the WPIAL Class A playoffs at Baldwin. Shady Side Academy will face Avonworth in the quarterfinals at 6 p.m. Wednesday at Mars.
New Brighton 2, South Allegheny 1 — Maya Watkins scored both goals as No. 12 New Brighton (10-6-1) upset No. 5 South Allegheny (13-4-1) in the first round of the WPIAL Class A playoffs at Bethel Park. Amber Brownfield scored for South Allegheny. New Brighton will face Neshannock in the quarterfinals at 6 p.m. Wednesday at Seneca Valley.
Mt. Pleasant 7, Yough 0 — Mt. Pleasant (12-5-1) earned a WPIAL Class AA preliminary round win over Yough (8-9-1) at Yough. Mt. Pleasant will play No. 1 West Allegheny at 8 p.m. Monday at West Allegheny.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.