High school roundup: Hopewell girls upset 3-time defending champion Mars
TribLIVE Sports Videos
There will be a new WPIAL girls soccer champion in Class AA after No. 8 Hopewell upset three-time defending champion Mars, 2-1, in the WPIAL quarterfinals Wednesday.
Shannon Shawgo scored with eight minutes remaining to give the Vikings (14-4) the victory. Tori Kopchak scored for top-ranked Mars (15-2-2).
Hopewell advances to face No. 5 South Park (15-3-2) in the semifinals Monday at a time and site to be determined.
Moon 1, Yough 0 — Megan Schoenweis scored on a penalty kick with 13:17 left to lead No. 3 Moon (19-1) to a quarterfinal-round victory.
Central Valley 3, Belle Vernon 1 — Olivia Pritt, Ashley Mutkus and Carolina Lucci scored to lead No. 2 Central Valley (17-0-0) to a WPIAL quarterfinal-round victory. Ally Demko scored for Belle Vernon (14-5-1). Central Valley will play Moon in the semifinals Monday.
Upper St. Clair 2, Fox Chapel 1 — Senior forward Olivia Belack and sophomore Emma Hasco scored to lead No. 12 Upper St. Clair (11-6-2) to an upset over No. 4 Fox Chapel (17-2-1) in a WPIAL Class AAA quarterfinal at Chartiers Valley. The Panthers advanced to the semifinals Monday against No. 1 Seneca Valley (16-2-1).
Greensburg Central Catholic 7, Springdale 1 — Penn State recruit Fran Crouse scored five goals and freshman Bailey Cartwright added two for No. 1 Greensburg Central Catholic (16-1) in a quarterfinal-round victory. Casey Hughes scored in the second half for No. 9 Springdale (12-7).
New Brighton 4, Neshannock 3 — Maya Watkins scored all four goals, including the game-winner with five minutes remaining, to lead No. 12 New Brighton (11-6-1) to an upset over No. 4 Neshannock (12-3-3) in the quarterfinals. New Brighton will face No. 1 Greensburg Central Catholic in the semifinals.
Sewickley Academy 1, Bishop Canevin 0, OT — Sophia Werner scored four minutes into overtime to lead No. 7 Sewickley Academy (11-6-3) past No. 2 Bishop Canevin (16-3-1) in the quarterfinals. Sewickley Academy will face No. 3 Shady Side Academy in the semifinals.
Shady Side Academy 4, Avonworth 0 — Maggie Scott scored twice to lead No. 3 Shady Side Academy (16-3) to a quarterfinal win over No. 6 Avonworth (15-5). Elizabeth Harper and Zoe Schoen scored for Shady Side Academy, while goalkeeper Olivia Cochran recorded four saves in the shutout.
Fox Chapel 1, Pine-Richland 0 — Jenna Alexander scored the game-winning goal with 12 minutes remaining to lead Fox Chapel to a first-round win in the WPIAL Class AAA playoffs.
North Allegheny 1, Peters Township 0, 2 OT — Jessica Brandon scored with two minutes remaining in the second overtime as North Allegheny won a first-round game in the WPIAL Class AAA playoffs. North Allegheny will host Fox Chapel in the championship game at 8 p.m. Tuesday.
Shady Side Academy 2, Ellis 1, SO — Quinn Wilajanapa scored the deciding penalty stroke to lead Shady Side Academy to a first-round win in the WPIAL Class AA playoffs.
Winchester Thurston 3, Greensburg Central Catholic 1 — Ally Siegel, Elizabeth Seifert and Alexa Zytnick scored to lead Winchester Thurston to a first-round win in the WPIAL Class AA playoffs. Winchester Thurston will face Shady Side Academy in the championship at 6:15 p.m. Tuesday at North Allegheny.
Norwin 3, Oakland Catholic 0 —Catherine Ferragonio led Norwin with 13 kills, 24 digs and three aces in a Class AAA first-round playoff match. Hannah Cubarney added nine kills. Norwin never trailed in the first two games, winning 25-13 and 25-20, and overcame a 3-0 deficit in the third game to win, 25-20.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.