Peters Township boys upset Upper St. Clair to win WPIAL championship
By Jason Mackey| Friday, Nov. 1, 2013, 10:06 p.m.
Goalkeeper Max O'Hare, like he did so many times on this night, made the save.
Striker Mario Mastrangelo finished it off by scoring the key goal to make the stunning, 1-0 upset of top-seeded Upper St. Clair possible.
Mastrangelo's strike in the 64th minute gave the seventh-seeded Peters Township boys soccer team all the scoring it would need in the WPIAL Class AAA championship game at Highmark Stadium.
That's because O'Hare, who didn't allow a goal in four WPIAL playoff games, was spectacular.
“I'm only as strong as my defenders,” O'Hare said. “If they keep the harder shots out, it's my job to keep the rest away.”
Peters Township (17-3-2) now has won eight WPIAL titles.
“We know to build toward this,” Peters Township coach Bob Dyer said. “Regular season we keep learning.
“We're playing our best soccer right now.”
Said Mastrangelo: “This is what we've been waiting all season to do.”
Peters Township will play Canon-McMillan, the consolation game winner, Tuesday at Chartiers Valley to open the PIAA playoffs. Upper St. Clair (19-1-1) will play District 10 winner Erie McDowell the same night, site and time to be determined.
O'Hare started the key sequence by diving to his left and making a left-handed stop on Joe Bell in the 63rd minute.
Mastrangelo pushed a shot inside the far post from about 15 yards. Mastrangelo has three goals these playoffs and 18 for the season, but no question this one belonged to O'Hare.
“With the amount of chances we had, we could've won two games,” Upper St. Clair coach Uwe Schneider said.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.