ShareThis Page

Ball bounces Upper St. Clair's way in PIAA soccer

| Saturday, Nov. 9, 2013, 7:09 p.m.
Upper St. Clair's Doug Hapeman (second from left) heads in a goal against Peters Township on Saturday, Nov. 9, 2013, during the second half of their PIAA Class AAA quarterfinal at Chartiers Valley High School.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Upper St. Clair's Doug Hapeman (second from left) heads in a goal against Peters Township on Saturday, Nov. 9, 2013, during the second half of their PIAA Class AAA quarterfinal at Chartiers Valley High School.

Upper St. Clair goalkeeper Will Petley insisted the tip of his middle finger touched Mario Mastrangelo's penalty kick in the 48th minute of Saturday's PIAA Class AAA quarterfinal against Peters Township.

Did he? That's highly debatable.

His finger sure didn't keep the ball out of the goal. The post handled that.

But the thwarted attempt did underscore how the bounces went for Upper St. Clair and against the Indians during a 3-0 Panthers win at Chartiers Valley.

“The whole time I was thinking, ‘If this goes in, the game's going to change, and they're going to have the momentum,'” Petley said. “I didn't want to let these guys down, so I did my best to get to it.

“When we stopped that, I knew we had the momentum. We kind of picked it up and ran with it. Got a couple more goals, and it turned out well for us.”

Troye Kiernan, Doug Hapeman and Garrett Blake scored for Upper St. Clair, which will play Cumberland Valley on Tuesday, site and time to be determined.

Upper St. Clair (21-1-1) avenged a 1-0 loss to the Indians (18-4-2) in the WPIAL Class AAA final eight days ago. The Panthers generated plenty of chances in both games, though they were able to finish them Saturday.

“Sometimes, they go in, and sometimes, they don't,” Upper St. Clair coach Uwe Schneider said. “Maybe ask the ball. That's just how it is. I knew if we got a goal that we were going to win this game.”

For Peters Township, the loss concluded a tremendous run to the WPIAL title, where the seventh-seeded Indians knocked off No. 10 North Allegheny; No. 2 Seneca Valley; defending championship Canon-McMillan, seeded No. 11; and the top-seeded Panthers.

A 2-1 victory over the Big Macs produced this rematch, but the Indians, now with eight WPIAL titles, might've run out of steam.

“We struggled to play with passion and heart,” Peters Township coach Bob Dyer said. “They won their share of the 50-50 balls, and that comes down to being in the game. They finished their chances. We missed our chances.”

Kiernan converted on a penalty kick in the 16th minute for Upper St. Clair's first goal.

Indians defender Max Lindsay made a fantastic stop six minutes later, clearing the crease by kicking a Dom Caruso header out of mid-air in the 22nd minute. Dylan Weyers made a similar goal-saving stop in the 70th minute.

Hapeman made it 2-0 after Blake's throw-in and a scrum in front of the Peters Township goal in the 57th minute. Blake stretched the lead to 3-0 with a powerful shot from about 20 yards in the 73rd.

“All through the season, everyone kids with me because I'm ambitious with those shots,” Blake said. “I just took a touch and thought I would give it another try.

“I struck it really well.”

Upper St. Clair might've lost in the WPIAL final for a second consecutive season, but now the Panthers are one step closer to defending their PIAA Class AAA title.

“That was a game that everyone wanted to win,” Blake said of the WPIAL final. “But this is the more important one. Losing then really gave us extra motivation to play here. If we had won then, things might've been different.”

Jason Mackey is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @Mackey_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.