Donora resident Malea Fabean recently capped an outstanding scholastic soccer career at Greensburg Central Catholic by helping to lead GCC (21-2) to a second straight PIAA Class A title after a 2-1 win over Southern Columbia last week.
Fabean was named All-Section and All-WPIAL four times and made the All-State Team twice.
During her career, GCC also won the WPIAL Class A crown twice.
Over the four years that she played for the Centurions, her teams had a combined record of 81-9-1 and won 40 straight section games while outscoring opponents, 562-79.
This past season, she scored 46 goals and added 30 assists.
She scored 152 goals, ranking 11th all-time in the state. She is also the only player in state history to have eclipse 100 goals and 100 assists in a career.
Her 117 assists are tops all-time in the state.
Not only was she a top scoring talent, but she was also used at times to play defense for GCC by coach Ashley Shasko.
Shasko had her start the semifinal and final games in the PIAA playoffs as a defender.
Fabean will continue her playing career at Pitt and will begin attending classes at the university in January after graduating from GCC in December.
Her prolific scoring ability will be a welcomed addition to a Panthers team that finished 4-14-1 on the season, including 0-13 in their first season in the rugged ACC.
The conference features five teams in the Sweet Sixteen of the NCAA Tournament.
She is the daughter of Rob and Kristy Fabean of Donora.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.