Fox Chapel boys soccer looks to replace 10 graduates with talent-laden group
TribLIVE Sports Videos
The Fox Chapel boys soccer team had another successful season last year, compiling a 16-2 record and advancing to the quarterfinals of the WPIAL Class AAA tournament before losing to Canon-McMillan, 1-0.
Fox Chapel coach Erik Ingram is optimistic that the Foxes can make it back to the playoffs.
“We have a few very strong players that will provide leadership and offer experience,” he said. “Overall, we are a very young team as far as experience. I don't have any concerns about that.
“The team is looking great, and they are amazingly coachable. The team chemistry is also great this year and will help further develop the program.”
The Foxes took a big hit to graduation as they lost a dozen varsity players from last year.
Along with the 10 seniors, one player went back to Brazil and another moved to Philadelphia. The key returning players are high-scoring senior forward Cole Ryan, a three-year starter and all-section choice in 2012 and 2013; senior goalie Matt Herrman; senior midfielder Kota Furuhata; senior back Elliot Norman; and sophomore center/midfielder Nathan Wecht.
Ryan and Herrman will take over as team captains.
Also expected to make an impact are junior back Zach Weigand, junior forward Teddy Wight and sophomore midfielder Michael Snowball.
“We've also got a half-dozen freshmen who could contribute,” Ingram said.
There will be a new look to Section 3-AAA this season, which should make it even more challenging.
The group includes Franklin Regional, Gateway, Kiski Area, Penn Hills, Plum and Woodland Hills.
“Newcomers Kiski Area and Franklin Regional are now in the section, and I feel that both teams should be battling for playoff spots,” Ingram said. “It will be a very balanced section.”
Marty Stewart is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-782-2123 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.