ShareThis Page

Westmoreland high school roundup: Yough softball topples Keystone Oaks

| Thursday, April 20, 2017, 9:15 p.m.

Alona Sleith's two-run home run in the sixth inning helped the Yough softball team induce the mercy rule in a 12-2 win over Keystone Oaks in Section 2-4A play Thursday afternoon.

It was the top-ranked Cougars' second win in as many days over Keystone Oaks.

Olivia Miller was 3 for 3 with two home runs and five RBIs, Sleith and Hannah Bach each finished 3 for 4, and Kayley Westerman was 3 for 3. Aubrie Mance was 2 for 4 with two RBIs for Yough (10-1, 7-0), which belted 16 hits.

Kierra Waywood tossed a four-hitter with 11 strikeouts to earn the win.

Greensburg Salem 6, Woodland Hills 3 — In Section 1-5A, Nikki Mellinger had two doubles and Mattie White earned the win as Greensburg Salem (3-7, 3-6) scored a victory.

Hempfield 15, Allderdice 0 (3 inn.) — Laura Fox had two doubles and four RBIs and Jenna Osikowicz had two doubles with three RBIs as No. 1 Hempfield (11-0, 6-0) won in Section 2-6A. Maddie Uschock threw a one-hitter with seven strikeouts.

Boys tennis

Indiana 5, Greensburg Salem 0 — In the first round of the WPIAL Class AA playoffs, Zachary Palko, Joey Bujdos and Giaco Gentile won singles matches in straight sets as Indiana advanced to Monday's quarterfinals.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.