Share This Page

Woodland Hills looks to avenge loss to Upper St. Clair

| Wednesday, Nov. 14, 2012,
Tribune-Review
Gateway wide receiver Delvon Randall hauls in a pass as Woodland Hills defenders Trevon Mathis (3) and Bruce Curry (34) defend during their WPIAL Class AAAA quarterfinal on Friday, Nov. 9, 2012, at Norwin High School. Barry Reeger | Tribune-Review

Woodland Hills and Upper St. Clair had a lengthy hiatus in their series, but the teams are quickly making up for lost time.

After not playing since the Wolverines came away with a 28-15 victory in the 2005 WPIAL Class AAAA quarterfinals, they will take the field for the second time this season Friday at Baldwin, with a spot in the championship game at Heinz Field on the line.

Upper St. Clair (10-1) got the best of Woodland Hills (9-2) when the teams met in the season opener Aug. 31. Panthers quarterback Pete Coughlin ran for three fourth-quarter touchdowns in a 31-12 victory.

“It's hard for both of us to play a team we've played before, but you look at what they did well against you before and how they've done in their recent games because they've evolved to where they're at,” Novak said. “Playing Upper St. Clair, it's always tough to play them because coach (Jim) Render is, by far, the best coach in the WPIAL; defensively, they're one of the best defenses in the WPIAL year in and year out; and their offense, with all its motions, is tough to prepare for.”

Woodland Hills is coming off one of its best defensive performances of the season in a 17-14 quarterfinal victory over second-seeded Gateway. The Wolverines made the Gators one-dimensional by negating their running attack (minus-39 yards on 18 carries).

“When you're in the playoffs every game's different, and against Gateway, our first objective was to stop the run and not let them throw deep on us,” Novak said. “We were able to contain their run, and they threw the ball 49 times on us and that was a lot of passing. But our secondary did a nice job, and against St. Clair, it's going to be totally different.”

One of the reasons Woodland Hills was able to defeat highly touted Gateway was the offensive spark of freshman Miles Sanders, who carried 14 times for 93 yards and both of the team's touchdowns.

Though Sanders was a nonfactor when the Wolverines and Upper St. Clair met in the opener — he had just three carries for 17 yards — he developed into the team's leading ground gainer with 111 carries for 640 yards and 10 touchdowns.

Unfortunately for the Wolverines, he'll be on the sideline watching the rematch. Sanders left the Gateway game in the third quarter with an undisclosed injury.

Without him in the lineup, the Wolverines will return to a running-back-by-committee approach they used early in the year with senior Alex Beasley and Dequan White in the backfield to complement reverses from wide receiver Khalil Harper.

“We have some other running backs that will get opportunities this week,” Novak said. “We'll see who goes in.”

Coming up with a winning formula, even with senior 1,000-yard passer Cody McClelland, will be a challenge against an Upper St. Clair defense that has not been scored upon in the tournament. The Panthers are the only team in the WPIAL playoffs in any classification not to allow a postseason point.

Still, Woodland Hills was able to hold Gateway to more than 23 points under its season average. Maybe the Wolverines can glean something from that first meeting to help them break the Panthers' shutout streak.

“We threw the ball a little on them, but we weren't able to run the ball at all,” Novak said. “We won't have Miles this week, so we'll let him take the week off and see what happens.”

Keith Barnes is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at kbarnes@tribweb.com or 412-664-9161 Ext. 1977.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.