EF softball team labeled as squad to reckon with
By Keith Barnes
Published: Thursday, March 21, 2013, 1:06 a.m.
Elizabeth Forward made a surprising run in the WPIAL Class AAA playoffs last season when, as the ninth seed in the tournament, posted three upset victories and advanced to the championship game.
Though making it to California (Pa.) for the finals was impressive, the Warriors' season ended abruptly with a 7-0 loss to Montour and a 3-2 defeat to District 10 champion Ford LeBoeuf in the opening round of the PIAA Class AAA tournament.
Having the season end the way it did after such a winning streak left the team eager for the start of the 2013 campaign.
“It's been interesting,” Elizabeth Forward coach Harry Rutherford said. “I think with the way it ended last year, it left them a little sour with our performance. But it was a young squad, and they really want to improve on that performance, so they've really been working hard over the winter.”
Not only have the players been working on the fundamentals, they've spent quite a bit of time in the weight room in an effort to get stronger for what could be a long grind if the team plays again into June. Considering the path the Warriors must take this season, they'll need all the strength — physical and mental — they can muster.
Elizabeth Forward (17-8 in 2012) will play in a revamped Section 3 this season that, thanks to WPIAL biennial realignment, might be the toughest in the classification. The Warriors have to deal with traditional rival and title contender Belle Vernon, 2012 playoff team Yough moves in from Section 2, and Southmoreland has moved up from Class AA. The Scotties boast Class AA all-state pitcher Anna Marie Gatti, who transferred after two years at Greensburg Central Catholic.
“With the section being what it is, it's not going to be an easy run,” Rutherford said. “We lose one team (Ringgold) and get two playoff teams … so what that means is that there's going to be a good team in Section 3 that doesn't make the playoffs.”
Not only is the section more difficult, but teams will be gunning for Elizabeth Forward to make sure a run like last season's doesn't happen again.
“We kind of snuck up on people, but we didn't expect that,” Rutherford said. “We're not sneaking up on anybody this year, and we've really been pushing that through the kids' heads that they're really going to be prepared for us — and they know it.”
One thing about Elizabeth Forward last season: it was a young team that was just cutting its teeth in the postseason. This will be a veteran team led by junior pitcher Portia McBride, who won't be thrown into the fray only after the initial starter was injured, like she was a year ago.
“We're trying to get her to hit her locations better than she did last year, because some of the mistakes she made were not throwing her pitches in the locations that we called,” Rutherford said. “That's been a point of emphasis since we got back together, so she could hit the outside corner when we need to and throw the ball off the plate. She made too many mistakes getting the ball in too far on (certain) counts.”
Despite learning on the fly, she still finished 17-8 and was an honorable mention all-state selection. And the Warriors need her to be better in 2013.
“She's more mature, and her knowledge of how to pitch the game has gotten better because I think last year she thought that she could just throw the ball by hitters,” Rutherford said. “We're trying to get her to be a little more of a finesse pitcher this year.”
Keith Barnes is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @KBarnes_Trib.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.