California girls are low on numbers, not expectations
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Third-year California Area head softball coach Earl Doman knows his team is facing the same problem as many other Class A schools.
“Staying healthy will be a key since we only have 11 players,” Doman said, who served as an assistant for five years prior to taking over the program.
“That and pitching are the keys.”
Despite the limited numbers, Doman does have five players who are entering at least their third year as starters, and the quintet of players will provide him with 17 years of experience in the starting lineup.
Leading the way are two seniors who are entering their fourth year as starters: the battery of pitcher Christina Puhnaty and catcher Elizabeth Scales.
Two more seniors, second baseman Emily Sabo and centerfielder Ashley Metzler, enter their third season in the starting lineup.
Junior shortstop Tristan Lint also enters the season as a three-year starter.
Senior Tiffany Kent will play first base, and junior Kelsea Lincoski rounds out the infield at third base.
Sophomore Rachel Wilkerson will handle the left field duties, while freshman Destiny Gudel is in right field.
A pair of sophomores, Alexa Angelo and Madison Dobas, will provide the team with depth as they can play multiple positions.
The Lady Trojans are coming off a 7-12 season that included a 13-8 loss to Riverview in the WPIAL Class A playoffs.
It marked their first playoff season since 2009.
California is in the deep Section 2 A along with seven other teams.
They include Monessen, Frazier, Jefferson Morgan, Serra Catholic, Carmichaels, Mapletown and West Greene.
Can the Lady Trojans make it back to the playoffs for a second consecutive season?
“The season will be a success if we play above .500 ball and make the playoffs,” Doman said. “I expect us to be competitive.”
Bill Hughes is a feelance writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.