Hampton softball scores section win after tough start
The beginning to the season has been a bit of a rough go for the Hampton softball team.
A couple of defensive breakdowns here or there had the team off to an 0-3 start.
“Our defense has let us down a little,” Hampton coach Ron Fedell said.
“We had seven errors against Indiana (in a 12-7 loss), and we gave three extra outs to Mars (in an 8-7 loss). Then it happened again against Kittanning. We spotted Kittanning a 5-0 lead but rallied to have a chance to win in the bottom of the seventh inning.”
Hampton trailed, 5-3, at that point, and with a runner on first, a line-drive was smacked at the pitcher. Unfortunately for Hampton, that ball was caught. That meant that Breanna Lent's hit in the next at-bat was not as valuable as it could have been, and the rally fizzled to leave the final score 5-3.
“Softball is a game of inches,” Fedell said.
“And unfortunately, the inches have not gone our way.”
It appeared things still were working against Hampton when it faced Knoch.
Hampton again surrendered a 5-0 lead, but this time the team was able to rally with five unanswered runs in the top of the seventh for an 8-6 win. Claire Welka picked up the victory, and Jocelyn White hit a double to help the bats come alive for Hampton.
“Usually it takes our hitting a while to come around, and our fielding has to get better,” Fedell said.
“My goal right now is to stay positive and make sure the kids stay positive, too.”
The first win of the season — a section victory — could be a start.
Hampton will hit the road for a rematch with Indiana at 3:30 p.m. today, Thursday.
The team is scheduled to play North Hills at McIntyre Field on Friday, then resume section play on April 23, when Mars visits at 3:45.
Jerry Clark is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-779-6979 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.