ShareThis Page

Hot offense keys Norwin turnaround

| Thursday, April 18, 2013, 11:45 a.m.
Doug Gulasy | Norwin Star
Norwin freshman Christiana Skrabak is congratulated by the third-base coach after hitting a home run against Penn-Trafford in the bottom of the first inning April 11, 2013, at Norwin High School. The Knights won, 11-2.
Doug Gulasy | Norwin Star
Norwin freshman Christiana Skrabak connects on a pitch against Penn-Trafford in a game Thursday, April 18, 2013, at Norwin High School. The Knights beat their section rival, 11-2.

Norwin softball coach Andy Phipps thought his team was hitting well the first three games of the season. Those hits just weren't coming at the right time, however, as the Knights stumbled to an 0-3 start ­— with two defeats coming by one run.

Consider that trend reversed.

Propelled by consistent ­— and timely — hitting, Norwin swept two conference games last week to even its record at 3-3 heading into section action against Kiski on Tuesday.

“The last few games, when we had girls on base, the next girl who came up in the lineup was able to move the girls in,” Phipps said. “That was huge. We actually had solid hits from all nine batters the last few games.”

After beating Gateway, 6-2, on April 5 for its first victory of the season, Norwin (3-3, 2-3) followed with conference wins over Connellsville (11-4) and Penn-Trafford (11-2) last week. The defending section champions moved into a fourth-place tie in Section 1-AAAA with Franklin Regional.

Sophomore catcher Maddy Wensel led the offensive onslaught against Connellsville and Penn-Trafford. The cleanup hitter recorded four hits against the Falcons, including a home run and double, and followed that by going 2 for 2 with another homer and double against Penn-Trafford on Thursday.

Wensel leads the team with a .667 batting average, six doubles and nine runs batted in. Her two home runs are tied for best on the team.

“I just go up there with a clear mind, and I like killing the ball,” Wensel said. “I feel like there's a really big responsibility (hitting cleanup), and there is a lot of pressure on it — but the girls have my back, and they support me so much.”

That teammate support includes a collective batting effort. Five players outside of Wensel were hitting .300 or better heading into this week: seniors Nikki Ingel (.550), Cassidy Chappell (.444) and Lauren Long (.316); junior Lyndsay Robinson (.409); and freshman Christiana Skrabak (.444).

Phipps said the production from Long at the bottom of the order has been significant, as has the play of Skrabak out of the leadoff spot. Skrabak led off two of the Knights' past three games with home runs.

“You can't ask for a better start than that, especially out of a freshman,” he said.

Wensel said the improved hitting came because of greater team focus. At 2-3 in the section, the Knights trail section leader Latrobe by three games, second-place Hempfield by one-and-a-half games and third-place Penn-Trafford by one game.

“The first three losses put us in a tough spot in the section as far as making the playoffs,” Wensel said. “But going into (last week's) games, we just had to focus in more, and I think we did really well with that.”

The Knights planned to finish an earlier suspended game against Kiski on Tuesday and follow it with another game against the Cavaliers later that afternoon. The games ended past the deadline for this week's edition.

Doug Gulasy is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5830 or via Twitter @dgulasy_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.