ShareThis Page

Jeannette softball chasing program's second playoff appearance

| Thursday, April 18, 2013, 12:03 a.m.
Guy Wathen | Tribune-Review
Jeannette's Brianna Crawford waits on the pitch during a game with East Allegheny April 15, 2013, in Jeannette.
Guy Wathen | Tribune-Review
Jeannette's Nicole Hall delivers a pitch during a game with East Allegheny April 15, 2013, in Jeannette.
Guy Wathen | Tribune-Review
Jeannette's softball team huddles before a game with East AlleghenyApril 15, 2013, in Jeannette.
Guy Wathen | Tribune-Review
Jeannette's Delaney Cortazzo makes a grab during a game against East Allegheny on April 15, 2013, in Jeannette.

History hasn't always been nice to the Jeannette softball team.

The Jayhawks have just one playoff appearance in school history (2010), but the second may not be too far down the road.

Coach Dee Cortazzo's squad, winners of four straight lopsided contests, improved its Section 3-A mark to 4-2 on Tuesday with a commanding 10-1 victory over Geibel.

In the victory, freshman pitcher Mary Katherine Paulone made her first varsity start — and it was quite a memorable one as she delivered a 13-strikeout no-hitter.

“She really stepped in and delivered a great performance,” Cortazzo said. “Last year, we only really had one pitcher. I think, with Mary Katherine's performance, we now have two we can count on to carry us along.”

The Jayhawks have rebounded from a 1-3 start in which they scored just 15 runs. Since then, Jeannette has averaged just less than 10 runs per game over its past four outings.

“We're starting to jell now,” Cortazzo said. “I thought it would take several games being that we were inside most of the spring. As a whole we've been kind of sporadic, but the last week or so the girls have really been seeing the ball well and putting it in play.”

Jeannette dropped to Class A this season, and one of Cortazzo's main goals is teaching the team how to win. The Jayhawks finished just 4-12 last season and lost eight players to graduation.

“This is still a pretty inexperienced bunch,” she said. “We have a lot of players playing new positions, but overall I really thought we had the makeup to be a competitive team.”

The Jayhawks dropped two games to Vincentian Academy (4-2, 4-2) and Riverview (5-3, 5-1) — two Class A perennial powers — but rebounded to shut out Vincentian, 10-0, two days after a loss to the Royals.

Cortazzo sees Jeannette being in the thick of the section title race at the midway point.

“There are a lot of strong teams down here,” she said. “We won at Leechburg (5-1, 5-1), and they are a very good team. We will see them again and get another shot at Riverview coming up. Those are going to be huge games for us.”

One key player for the Jayhawks is junior pitcher Nicole Hall, who is not only Jeanette's top pitcher but also one of its top hitters.

“Nicole has a very calming presence,” Cortazzo said. “She never loses her head and is really a leader on the field and off. I really believe, in this game, your pitcher has to stay calm and not get frazzled. She does a great job of staying in control, and her teammates feed off of it.”

Senior Delaney Cortazzo leads the offense, hitting more than .500 in the early going.

Dee Cortazzo isn't necessarily expecting her team to continue scoring double-digit runs but is enthused by it.

“It's been hard to single out our top hitters lately,” she said. “Really, one through nine have all been hitting the ball well. We are even getting some hits off the bench.”

At the halfway point, it's safe to say the Jayhawks are exceeding expectations after a lackluster season a year ago.

“So far so good,” Dee Cortazzo said. “We're right in the thick of things and have put ourselves in position to be in the playoff race. We're going to continue working hard and hope it turns out well for us.”

Brian Hunger is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.