Frazier softball team strikes early to defeat Monessen
TribLIVE Sports Videos
The seniors on the Frazier softball team have known nothing but success. The Commodores reached the second round of the WPIAL Class A playoffs in each of the past three seasons.
This year looks to be even more promising, as Frazier has been enjoying continued success in Section 2-A.
Frazier (9-1, 8-1) beat Monessen, 10-2, on Tuesday using the same formula it has all season: scoring early, then allowing senior Andrea Lash to shut down the opposition.
The Commodores struck for five runs in the first inning, and that was all Lash needed.
“That's pretty much what we have been doing all season,” Frazier coach Paul Harvey said. “We score early and then let her do what she does.”
A two-out, two-run triple by Monessen's Taylor Guzzie in the bottom of the sixth inning cost Lash a shutout. Lash finished with a four-hitter, struck out six and walked none.
Kelsey Holp and Caitlyn Brown stroked RBI singles in the first inning, and Lash added a two-run single.
The score was 10-0 in the bottom of the sixth when Guzzie smacked her second triple to get Monessen on the board.
“That's a good team,” Harvey said of the Greyhounds (5-5, 3-5). “They are winning more and they are in the playoff race, and they will only get better.”
For the Greyhounds, falling behind early was costly.
“We did exactly what we have tried not to do this season, and that's let a team jump on us early,” Monessen coach Bo Teets said. “After the first two innings, it was a pretty even game and that is one of the better teams in Class A. We just have to learn how to win.”
For Frazier, Alexis Livingstone, Brittany Strothers and Holp each had two hits.
Monessen's Shelby Minardi took the loss, giving up 11 hits with four strikeouts and a walk.
Jeff Oliver is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-684-2666 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.