ShareThis Page

Greensburg Central Catholic softball closes in on first section title since '08

| Thursday, April 25, 2013, 8:06 p.m.
Eric Schmadel | Tribune-Review
Steel Valley shortstop Skyler Vinay tags out Greensburg Central Catholic baserunner Sierra Mathos at second base during their April 25, 2013 contest in Greensburg.
Eric Schmadel | Tribune-Review
Greensburg Central Catholic catcher Carolyn Appleby tags out Steel Valley baserunner Leena Zahir at home during their game Thursday, April 25, 2013, in Greensburg.

After reeling off seven consecutive victories that locked up a WPIAL Class AA playoff berth, Steel Valley was primed to make a statement and earn a share of first place in Section 4.

Instead of the Ironmen vaulting themselves into darkhorse contention for a title, however, Greensburg Central Catholic used the game to lay a claim of its own.

Greensburg Central Catholic (8-3, 7-1) opened the bottom of the first with three consecutive hits that led to a trio of runs that helped the Centurions roll to an 8-2 victory over Steel Valley (8-3, 6-3). The win brought GCC to within one win of locking up at least a share of the section title.

“I like the way they fought the whole game, but some things just didn't go our way,” Steel Valley coach Matt Janov said. “Some of the balls they hit kind of fell in, and they hit some balls hard, too, and we made some (mistakes) that first inning that really kind of got us off on the wrong foot.”

With Steel Valley stuck playing uphill throughout the game, Greensburg Central Catholic was able to relax on a home field that has been none too kind to the team in recent years. The Centurions were able to parlay the quick start into a victory that all but assured them of a share of their first section title since 2008. All they need is a win Friday at East Allegheny (1-9, 0-8) or Tuesday at home against Charleroi (4-6, 3-5) or a Steel Valley win Tuesday over second-place Brentwood.

“It makes it nice,” Greensburg Central Catholic coach Gary Ciarimboli said. “I want to win out and would like to win the section, and it would be nice for these girls who have never won a section because we haven't won a section in a while.”

Steel Valley could not catch a break thanks in large part to a Greensburg Central Catholic defense that stymied every opportunity. With one out in the first, Steel Valley's Lisa Straub singled and was thrown out trying to stretch the hit into a double.

The Ironmen also had a runner thrown out at third for the last out in the sixth that stopped a potential rally. Yet another runner was erased, this one at home, with one out in the seventh.

In addition, Greensburg Central Catholic center fielder Sierra Mathos made a diving catch with one on and none out in the fourth that limited the Ironmen to only one run instead of a big inning.

“We're starting to hit the ball, and I'm seeing that they're starting to hit the ball in the middle and the bottom of the lineup,” Janov said. “If they continue to hit the ball we'll be fine because our defense has been solid. But this was our worst defensive game all year.”

Steel Valley still can earn a second-place tie in the section with a win at home Tuesday against Brentwood, a team it lost to, 2-1, in the first meeting April 11. Whether they finish second or third, the Ironmen will be in a quandary after that game as their section slate will have ended and they have five nonsection games over the season's final two weeks.

Considering teams are notorious for cancelling late-season games, the Ironmen — and Centurions — could be penalized because only Section 1 and Section 4 have six members.

“What's nice is that we play some local teams like TJ and West Mifflin, and these guys are going to want to go hard against their friends in those friendly rivalries,” Janov said. “Those will be almost like a section game, and it's nice that we have those teams coming up. But it is a concern, and we have to keep them sharp.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.