Young Fox Chapel ends softball season with victory
The Fox Chapel Area High School softball team romped to a 12-1 win over Allderdice on May 8 to close out their season and FC coach Tom Wamsley hopes that his young team uses the win as a springboard for more success next season.
Isabella Brungo picked up the win, allowing two hits.
Sam Olbrich led the offense with a double and a homer. Hanna Yeager and Jen Moran also went deep for the Foxes while Alanna Palumbo belted a triple.
The Foxes finished with a 3-15 overall record and went 1-11 in the section.
The Foxes entered the season minus two key players as standout catcher Elly Wagner graduated early to attend North Carolina and starting pitcher Kim Corcoran transferred.
“Losing those two hurt us this season,” FC coach Tom Wamsley said. “Elly was our biggest bat and Kim was slated to be our top pitcher. We put a young, inexperienced team on the field in a new section that was very strong. But I'm proud of the kids. They fought hard and got some good experience.”
The Foxes will lose one senior, shortstop Jen Moran, and Wamsley knows she will be missed.
“Jen had a great season and she'll do well in college,” Wamsley said. “Her leadership and experience will be missed.”
On a positive note, Wamsley will have junior Kaylee Pistorius back.
“She had a great year at the plate,” he said. “She ended up at .395 with a pair of homers.”
Also returning will be sophomore Megan Walkowski.
“She played at both first and third base for us and she didn't make an error all season. That's pretty impressive,” Wamsley said.
“We'll have everybody else back and we've got some talented young players at the middle school level. The future looks promising.”
Marty Stewart is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-782-2123 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.