Share This Page

PIAA Class AA softball playoffs capsule: Deer Lakes (18-1) vs. Fairview (22-0)

| Monday, June 3, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Erica Dietz | Valley News Dispatch
Deer Lakes' Sierra Sarver tags out Leechburg's Kenzie Young during a softball game Thursday, May 9, 2013, at Leechburg Community Park..

PIAA Class AA softball playoffs

First round

Deer Lakes (18-1) vs. Fairview (22-0)

5 p.m. Monday

Penn State Behrend

Records: Deer Lakes 18-1, Fairview 22-0

Winner plays: Phillipsburg-Osceola/Chartiers-Houston winner

Coaches: Craig Taliani, Deer Lakes; Anita Deloe, Fairview

Notables: Deer Lakes will look to bounce back after a tough loss to Riverside in the WPIAL championship game. The normally sure-handed Lancers committed four errors that led to four unearned runs for Riverside in the 5-1 loss. They also struck out 11 times against Panthers pitcher Kirsten Wilson, who allowed four hits combined against three previous playoff opponents before giving up three to Deer Lakes. Senior catcher Hannah Blinn was the only player not to strike out against Wilson in the final. Blinn, who is hitting .484, has struck out once all season. Sophomore Tiffany Edwards, who is 26-1 in her career, doubled in the title game and drove in the team's only run. ... Fairview is a perennial contender in District 10, where it has won three straight championships. The Tigers have only lost twice in three seasons, with both coming in the PIAA playoffs. They are led by senior Raven Rozantz, who is 22-0, carries a 0.75 ERA and has 250 strikeouts. In the District 10 championship, junior first baseman Aubree Martin waved off a bunt, requested to swing away and slapped a game-winning single in the bottom of the ninth to give Fairview a 2-1 win over Harbor Creek. That game also was played at Penn State Behrend. Senior shortstop Kayla Kupniewski is hitting .540 with 26 runs and 19 RBI.

—Bill Beckner Jr.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.