Share This Page

Lorusso's home run leads Canon-McMillan past Hempfield

| Monday, June 3, 2013, 8:33 p.m.
Brian F. Henry | Tribune-Review
Canon-McMillan's softball team gathers around to cheer on teammate Olivia Lorusso (8) moments after she hit a two-run homer in the bottom of the fourth inning, scoring the winning run against Hempfield in a PIAA Class AAAA first-round matchup Monday, June 3, 2013, at North Allegheny High School in Wexford. Canon-McMillan won, 2-1.
Brian F. Henry | Tribune-Review
Canon-McMillan pitcher Alayna Astuto delivers a pitch during a PIAA Class AAAA first-round matchup Monday, June 3, 2013, at North Allegheny High School in Wexford. Canon-McMillan won, 2-1.
Brian F. Henry | Tribune-Review
Canon-McMillan's Alison Bellaire gets the force out at second base against Hempfield's Callie Madden during a PIAA Class AAAA first-round matchup Monday, June 3, 2013, at North Allegheny High School in Wexford. Canon-McMillan won, 2-1.
Brian F. Henry | Tribune-Review
Canon-McMillan's Olivia Lorusso smiles after rounding second base moments after she hit a two-run homer, scoring the winning run against Hempfield during a PIAA Class AAAA first-round matchup Monday, June 3, 2013, at North Allegheny High School in Wexford. Canon-McMillan won, 2-1.

One swing of the bat powered Canon-McMillan to a 2-1 victory over Hempfield on Monday in a first-round PIAA Class AAAA softball game.

Olivia Lorusso hit a towering two-run home run over the left field fence in the fourth inning, and righthander Alayna Astuto survived several Hempfield scoring threats to earn the victory for the Big Macs (22-1), whose only loss was a regular-season decision at Hempfield on April 5.

“Since then, we've come out in games knowing to play hard for seven innings,” Lorusso said. “One swing of the bat really can change a game. We were beating them, 6-0, in that game, and then, all of a sudden, they scored four runs, and they just kept scoring.”

Hempfield (18-7) went on to a 17-6 rout of Canon-McMillan in the early-season showdown that saw both teams rest their main pitchers.

Canon-McMillan, which advances to the PIAA quarterfinals Thursday against North Allegheny. Canon-McMillan defeated Hempfield, 5-0, in a WPIAL semifinals game on May 23 at California (Pa.) University.

“We know each other well,” Canon-McMillan coach Michele Moeller said. “This was a great game for us to come away with. You have to win tight games like this if you're going to keep going. We talked to the girls before the game about how one swing of the bat could make a difference.”

On Monday, it did — and Astuto made it stand, besting Hempfield righthander Hope Pehrson, who hadn't allowed a hit until Lorusso came through with her two-out homer in the fourth after Linda Rush had reached on shortstop Justyne Falbo's fielding error.

Hempfield outhit Canon-McMillan, 6-4, but the Spartans committed three errors and stranded seven runners, including three in the fourth inning and one in the seventh after they scored their only run on an RBI double by Alaina Montgomery.

“We swung at some pitches up around our eyes,” Hempfield coach Bob Kalp said of the Spartans' fourth-inning uprising that saw them load the bases on Rush's fielding error, a single by Maddy Knizner and a walk to Michaela Lebonne before Astuto induced Kelly Mahoney to pop out to third to end the threat.

After Taylor Bartlow singled in the seventh and scored Hempfield's lone run on Montgomery's double, Montgomery advanced to third on a late throw to home plate. But Astuto got Kelsie Hendrick to pop out to deep short, where Rush made a running catch, to end the game.

“Two more feet,” Kalp said, “and it would've been tied there. When it's all said-and-done, there's not too many teams who played 25 games this season. Unfortunately, we ran into a very good Canon-McMillan team in the first round.”

Dave Mackall is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at dmackall@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.