Plum slow-pitch squad set for playoffs
TribLIVE Sports Videos
The Plum varsity girls slow-pitch softball team joined the Western Pennsylvania Interscholastic Softball League last fall, and the Mustangs have qualified for the playoffs for the second time in as many seasons.
Plum, 10-4 overall, is the sixth seed in the 15-team varsity playoffs, and will open the tournament Saturday at 10 a.m. against Peters Township at Blueberry Park in Franklin Park.
If the Mustangs get past Peters Township, they will play in the quarterfinals at 2 p.m.
The semifinals are Sunday at 2 p.m., with the championship game at 4:30.
Plum split a two-game series with Peters Township during the regular season.
Mt. Pleasant, with a regular-season record of 12-2, is the top seed.
West Allegheny (12-2) is the No. 2 seed, followed by Bethel Park (12-2), Montour (11-3) and Ft. Cherry (10-4).
JV ends season
The Plum JV team concluded its season at 8-6 overall with a split of a doubleheader against North Allegheny Gold.
The Mustangs won game one, 19-12, and pulled away with five two-out runs in the top of the seventh.
Plum rallied from an early 9-3 deficit.
Shannon Soboslay led the Mustangs offense with a three-run home run, a double and seven runs batted in.
Savana Proden went 4 for 5, Marissa Wilson was 3 for 4 with a double and three RBI, and Alexa Ferchaw added three RBI.
The second game was all North Allegheny, which shut out Plum, 14-0, in five innings.
The loss snapped a four-game winning streak.
Michael Love is a staff writer with Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412- 388-5825 or at email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.