ShareThis Page

South Allegheny softball has similar look of 2011 PIAA qualifier

| Monday, March 31, 2014, 9:09 p.m.

They aren't quite Hal's Gals yet.

But Hal Minford's South Allegheny softball team could be heading down the path of the team of three years ago affectionately known as ‘Hal's Gals' that advanced to the WPIAL semifinals and qualified for the state playoffs for the first time in school history.

“Well, we have a long way before we can compare them,” Minford said.

But the similarities are eerie.

South Allegheny beat Riverview, 7-1, on Monday in a nonsection game to improve to 3-0 for the first time since the Hal's Gals team.

South Allegheny scored 47 runs through three games in 2011 and have scored 35 in three games this year.

The Gladiators start three seniors with a fourth seeing time — just like three years ago.

Minford has a workhorse underclassman pitcher, Brenna Pribanic, just like he had with Sarah Jacobs.

“Really, it is a different group,” Minford said. “It is just different. We played for the big fly with that group and look for three quick ones. With this group, we run a little more and try to put the ball in play.”

Some call it small ball, and Minford doesn't mind if that's what his team's identity is this year.

That was on display Monday when South Allegheny scored two runs in the first without a hit. An error on a grounder hit by Julia Giannandrea and two wild pitches sandwiched around a stolen base accounted SA's first run. A Spencer Lawson sacrifice fly added another.

After an RBI triple by Tiffany Naccarato in the third made it 3-0, South Allegheny took advantage of three sixth-inning errors by Riverview to score four more. Mikayla Stearns' single scored two, and run-scoring singles by Taylor Potts and Hannah Elder followed as the Gladiators led 7-0.

“I think you win championships with small ball,” Minford said. “You sit there and wait for the three-run bomb and that's what happened against Burrell (in the 2011 semifinals). We were waiting for that long ball and they have a dominant pitcher and that didn't happen. Now, we put the ball in play and make them field.”

Pribanic wasn't threatened until one out in the seventh. The sophomore lefty scattered five hits while striking out nine and not walking a batter.

If it wasn't for a fifth-inning error, Pribanic would've retired 12 consecutive batters into the final inning.

“She got in a groove late in the game when she started throwing the screwball,” Minford said.

“She started it down the middle and breaking it outside. We have been working on the rise ball to add to her repertoire.

“We have youth, but we have experience. It is still a young team, and that's exciting.”

Minford will get a good gauge on his team Tuesday when SA travels to Section 4-AA favorite Steel Valley.

“We always want to win the section and, realistically, if we get everybody back, everybody healthy and play our best softball, then we have a chance to do that,” Minford said.

That's something Hal's Gals did.

Mark Kaboly is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @MarkKaboly_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.