Jeannette softball remain undefeated in section play
The trap games.
What every coach fears.
The games a team should win but somehow lose. The games a team should dominate but, somehow, do not.
What every coach fears, including Jeannette softball head coach Zac Karas.
“You definitely want to win the games you know you should win,” said Karas. “If you want to get to where you want to go, you can't miss those opportunities.”
Jeannette had two such opportunities last week when the Lady Jayhawks, entering play last week undefeated in Section 3A, with games against section bottom-feeders St. Joseph and The Ellis School.
The Lady Jayhawks did not choke. A two-game scoring margin of 38-1 is indicative of how serious this team is about steamrolling through their section schedule undefeated.
“We have lofty goals,” said Karas. “And one of those goals is to go undefeated in the section. We know it will not be easy, but we are focused on that goal.”
Jeannette is halfway there at 6-0 in Section 3A entering this week's games thanks, in part, to last Wednesday's 22-0 win over The Ellis School and last Thursday's 16-1 win over St. Joseph.
Nicole Hall pitched complete games in both wins, tossing a perfect game in four innings over The Ellis School and scattering five hits and one unearned-run while striking out nine in the St. Joseph win.
“Nicole has been great all season,” said Karas. “She is hitting all of her spots and is really dominating opponents.”
Jeannette hit four home runs in the win over The Ellis School, one each by Hall, Brittany Crawford, Sarah Pitzer and Monique Redman, who told Karas it was her first home run at any level of softball.
Freshman Scarlett Stein cracked three hits in both games and Mary Katherine Paulone homered in the St. Joseph win.
Dave Moio is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.