ShareThis Page

Hot-hitting DuBois ousts Latrobe

Paul Schofield
| Thursday, June 5, 2014, 10:09 p.m.
DuBois base runner Cheyenne McKee slides safely past Latrobe catcher Jess Tatone during their PIAA Class AAAA quarterfinal Thursday, June 5, 2014, at Slippery Rock. DuBois defeated Latrobe, 9-5.
Barry Reeger | Tribune-Review
DuBois base runner Cheyenne McKee slides safely past Latrobe catcher Jess Tatone during their PIAA Class AAAA quarterfinal Thursday, June 5, 2014, at Slippery Rock. DuBois defeated Latrobe, 9-5.

It was one of those games for the Latrobe softball team Thursday in the PIAA Class AAAA quarterfinal at Slippery Rock.

Nothing seemed to go their way early and unfortunately for the Wildcats. The high they felt Monday after beating WPIAL champion Shaler became a low at the hands of District 9 champion DuBois, fresh of an upset victory over 2013 state champion Canon-McMillan.

DuBois (19-3) scored four runs in the first inning and coasted to a 9-5 victory against Latrobe. DuBois advances to the semifinals Monday against Souderton at a time and site to be determined.

The Beavers belted 13 hits off four Latrobe pitchers, knocking starter Meredith Carr out of the game in the first inning. Rachelle Kruzelak's two-run double ended Carr's day.

“That was a fantastic team win,” DuBois first-year coach Rick McClelland said about Monday's win. “The girls were so excited; there was no doubt that propelled us to this one.

“The girls came out of the box ready to roll. That was the difference in the game. It was nice to have that lead. It's a different game if you don't start like that.”

Latrobe got back-to-back singles by Maddy Stein and Jenna Raccor to open the second inning, but failed to score. Stein was called out at home on a controversial play at the plate.

“I felt there was obstruction,” Latrobe coach Alexa Bryson said. “I didn't feel Maddy had a chance to get to the plate because I felt the catcher had the plate blocked before she got the ball and had a play to make.”

DuBois tacked on a run in the second inning and added three more to take an 8-0 lead after three.

Bryson used four pitchers trying to break up DuBois' momentum.

“We had to do something,” Bryson said. “We had to change it up on them. It was a do-or-die game.”

Latrobe pitchers allowed five walks.

“We tell them you can give up big hits or big walks,” Bryson said. “But you can't give up both. They come back to bite you.

“They're a good team. I didn't think we had a letdown after beating Shaler. They came out strong like we did against Shaler. They got us on our heels and that's part of the game.”

Latrobe strung together six hits in the sixth and cut the deficit to 8-4. Ashley Perillo, Jenna Adams, Stein and Reilly McCracken drove in runs.

DuBois added a run in the sixth before Latrobe threatened to have another big inning in the seventh.

Lexie Zoppetti reached on an error, and Shelby Noel collected her third double of the game. Zoppetti scored on Perillo's sacrifice fly before winning pitcher Rachael Henry settled down to end the threat.

“What was important is that we threatened and put some runs up on the board,” Bryson said. “Although we didn't come out with the win, we still had the same heart and character we had all season.”

Raegan Hanna was 3 for 3 with two RBIs for DuBois. Every DuBois starter had a hit.

“Latrobe is a good hitting team,” McClelland said. “They proved that at the end of the game. You're not going to shut them down the whole game, so it was important to score first.”

Paul Schofield is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @Schofield_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.