WPIAL softball teams learn pitching trumps all in deep playoff runs
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Shaler softball coach Skip Palmer was eating breakfast at Eat ‘n Park with his assistant coaches Tuesday morning when talk turned to a topic many around the WPIAL are still trying to digest.
Seriously, not a single area baseball or softball team reached Friday's PIAA finals?
“When you have a one-game (series) to move on, it's tough. Anything can happen,” Palmer said. “It just so happened the WPIAL didn't make it this year. I'm not going to panic. I think the WPIAL will be back next year.”
It's the first time since 1997 that no WPIAL team has made the PIAA softball finals after the final two teams, Neshannock (Class A) and Greensburg Salem (Class AAA), fell in the state semifinals Monday.
Combining baseball, it's the first time since 1979 that neither a baseball nor a softball team from the WPIAL has advanced to the finals.
“That's amazing to me,” Greensburg Salem coach Jody Morgan said. “I keep thinking the softball around here is better than out east, but I guess I'm wrong.”
Maybe not wrong. Just different. For now.
Dominant pitching can carry any softball team. It just so happened there wasn't a ton of it this season.
Of the 12 teams that advanced to the PIAA tournament, 10 of them lacked a pitcher with experience beyond the WPIAL playoffs.
Neshannock's Madison Shaffer and Deer Lakes' Tiffany Edwards, a pair of juniors, are the only No. 1 pitchers to pitch in the state tournament in back-to-back years.
A season ago, Riverside's Kirsten Wilson, Greensburg Salem's Jayne Oberdorf and Canon-McMillan's Alayna Astuto put up absurd postseason numbers, with Wilson and Astuto leading their team to the PIAA finals. Astuto guided hers to a state title.
All three graduated, and replacing them has proven difficult.
“Obviously if you have an elite pitcher, it's going to help you tremendously,” said Chartiers-Houston coach Tricia Alderson, who led the Bucs to the PIAA finals in 2005 and 2010, winning in '10. “I don't think there's as many. I think the fact that they moved the mound back 3 feet several years back has really changed the game.”
The WPIAL doesn't lack for Division I hitting talent — Google names such as Lorusso, McCartney, Zeremenko, Gray, McGaffic, Oberdorf and DeMatteo — but no longer are there many lights-out hurlers, Morgan said.
“I have not seen a dominating pitcher since (Nicole Sleith) from Yough,” Morgan said. “I haven't seen anyone close to her in three years. We had Jayne (now at Marist). She wasn't even close to Sleith.”
Beaver coach Butch Rousseau had a different take.
“I think the hitting has caught up with the pitching,” Rousseau said.
Not only that, this is high school sports. Which means guarding against complacency can always be a factor.
Take Neshannock. Following his team's 5-4 loss to Claysburg-Kimmel on Monday, Lancers coach Tracy Kimmel recalled a story from when Neshannock followed the 2012 PIAA Class AA championship with a WPIAL title the next spring.
“After winning the state, it was like, ‘Did we win something here today?' ” Kimmel said. “This year meant a lot because we repeated.
“It's so hard to repeat. It really is.”
Canon-McMillan would know. The Big Macs won the PIAA Class AAAA title last year after getting an unreal playoff performance from Astuto: 54 innings, four runs on 26 hits with 53 strikeouts, five walks and a 0.26 ERA.
Shaffer, a Penn State recruit, was outstanding at times for Neshannock.
But the playing field has been evened because of the pitching circle moving back and the abundance of hitting talent in the area, Canon-McMillan coach Michele Moeller said.
The numbers bear that out. In 17 state playoff games involving WPIAL teams, teams averaged 9.2 runs per game. That's up from 6.2 over 25 playoff games a season ago.
“I think there are quality pitchers out there,” Moeller said. “But the hitters are all getting so much better.”
Still, when it comes to playoff softball, WPIAL teams found out the hard way that there's no way to replace elite pitching.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.