ShareThis Page

Norwin swimmers eye improvement this season

| Monday, Nov. 27, 2017, 11:00 p.m.

Things are looking up for the Norwin boys and girls swimming teams.

Almost everyone who competed for the Knights at the WPIAL Class AAA championship meet last season is expected back.

“We have a number of returning swimmers who will provide experience and leadership, and our new swimmers will add depth,” Knights coach Neil Rushnock said.

The Knights scored no points at the WPIAL championships.

Their best finish came in the boys 200-yard freestyle relay event, in which they were 21st.

Seniors Carson Shipley, Joey Astrab and Jarrett DeFoor come back from that team.

The girls posted their finest showing, 24th place, in a similar event with two freshmen and two sophomores competing.

The girls 400 freestyle relay also had two freshmen and two sophomores.

Tessa Czajowski, Courtney Kosanovich, Kristy Juart, Shelby Yusko and Allie Plassio are returning girls.

Shipley (boys 100 backstroke) was the Knights' top individual.

Astrab expects improvement, but said it will take a lot of effort.

“This year is going to be good if we work 100 percent,” he said.

The Knights will open the season Dec. 12 at home in a nonsection meet against Derry. Their first Section 1-AAA competition will be Jan. 4 at Connellsville.

Rushnock said the goals for both teams are to win as many meets as possible and have “as many swimmers as we can” qualify for the WPIAL championships.

Karen Kadilak is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.