Share This Page

Geibel swimmers succeed without a team

| Monday, Dec. 24, 2012, 7:47 p.m.
Geibel swimmers (from left) Steve Conko, Emily Zimcosky and John Paul Zimcosky have earned WPIAL-qualifying times, despite the fact that Geibel does not have a swim team. Jason Black/Daily Courier

Although Geibel doesn't have a swim team, the school certainly isn't lacking for talented swimmers.

This year, three Geibel students are representing their school by competing with the Connellsville High School team in select meets. Freshmen Emily Zimcosky and Steve Conko, as well as junior John Paul Zimcosky, are not only competing in the sport, they are excelling.

The Geibel trio took part in Connellsville's meet against Uniontown last week, and each hit WPIAL-qualifying marks in two events.

John Paul Zimcosky hit qualifying standards in the 50 freestyle (22.71) and the 200 freestyle (1:51.80). He's thrilled to be able to swim at the high school level and to represent the Gators, even if it is with another team.

“I feel really proud to represent my school because a lot of people don't recognize swimming as a sport,” Zimcosky said. “It is competitive, and we have a lot of school pride.”

Zimcosky added that even though he doesn't attend Connellsville, the swimmers there have been welcoming.

“They accepted us because we've practiced with them and we know most of them because we swim with them on the (Laurel Highlands Regional) YMCA swim team,” Zimcosky said.

All three swimmers have shown extreme dedication. They each spend approximately 18 hours a week training and swimming for their YMCA team. That has helped prepare them for competition at the high school level. It also has allowed them to adapt to the strange circumstances of swimming with one school while representing another.

“It's unusual, but if you love something, you do what you need to do,” Conko said.

Conko has qualified for WPIALs in the 200 individual medley (2:02) and the 100 backstroke (55.77). His best event may be the 100 butterfly, but he hasn't competed in it yet. Compared to the Zimcosky siblings, Conko got a late start in the sport.

“I started when I was 9 years old,” Conko said. “I played basketball and baseball, but then I found I was pretty good at swimming, and it grew on me.”

Conko noted that representing his school is great, and it's special considering that he has several Geibel classmates sharing the same experiences.

“It makes it so much better because they are some of my best friends in the world,” Conko said.

For Emily Zimcosky, the opportunity to compete in high school events is something she is thankful to have. She has made the most of her opportunity by posting WPIAL qualifying marks in the 200 individual medley (2:14.56) and the 100 freestyle (52.49).

“I really enjoy it,” Zimcosky said. “Swimming is a big part of my life, and I like the competition.”

All three swimmers have high goals for this season and beyond, and it's that type of determination that keeps each of them focused.

“I have days where I feel like I don't want to get in (the pool),” Emily Zimcosky said. “But I just look at the bigger picture.”

The big picture for the Geibel trio includes improving on times, doing well at WPIALs and possibly making a splash at states later this season.

“When you see a time that you are trying for, you know all the hard work paid off,” Conko said. “It's a really nice feeling.”

Jason Black is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at jblack@tribweb.com or 724-626-3534.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.