Share This Page

Derry swim teams look for ideal mix

| Tuesday, Jan. 1, 2013, 8:43 p.m.

The Derry boys and girls swim teams are rebuilding, but that's nothing new, coach Jeff Kelly said.

“Being a small school, we're always losing kids,” he said.

Both teams opened WPIAL Section 4-AA competition Tuesday at Valley.

Seniors Sydnee Shrum and Kathrine Curtin, junior Kealy Smartnick and sophomores Taylor Byers and Chelsea Dominick return to two relay teams that are intact after competing at the WPIAL championship last year.

Curtin (200-yard freestyle and 100 freestyle) and Byers (100 freestyle and 100 breaststroke) also competed individually.

Byers has potential to be one of the top swimmers in the WPIAL, Kelly said.

“I hate to heap expectations on someone so young, but she could be very good,” he said. “She's very versatile and is going to be a great find for some college (team).”

Shrum, a team co-captain, said the Trojans will be well represented at the WPIAL championship, where they finished 15th a year ago.

The boys team includes three swimmers who competed at the WPIAL championship last year.

Junior Dustin McCallen swam in the 50 freestyle and 100 butterfly, where he is closing in on school records, Kelly said.

Senior Tyler O'Barto joined McCallen in the 200 medley and 200 freestyle relays.

Senior Neil Byers was on the 400 freestyle relay team.

Byers, a co-captain, worries about a lack of depth.

“We have some good swimmers, but we lost some, too,” he said. “It's tough finding replacements.”

Kelly, in his 20th year as coach, expects junior Andrew Downey and freshman Austin Buterbaugh to make solid contributions.

Downey is back after swimming in only one meet last year, Kelly said.

Karen Kadilak is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.