FC swim teams post two wins
The Fox Chapel High School swim team picked up a pair of victories last week.
On Jan. 15, they went up against Hampton and the girls won by a 95-59 score while the boys won 93-78.
Miranda Simon and Addison Lynch each picked up wins in diving while Sia Beasly qualified for WPIALs in the 100 breaststroke. She has now qualified for all eight WPIAL events.
Amanda Todd made the cut in the 100 backstroke and qualified for the WPIAL meet. First place finishers included Kelly Arel (200 freestyle), Beasley (500 freestyle), Franny Dean (100 breaststroke), Anna Mucci (100 butterfly), and Amanda Todd (100 backstroke) as well as the 200 medley relay team.
The boys had nine first place finishes. Boys who finished first were Noah Cagley (200 freestyle and 100 butterfly), Scott Sterrett (50 freestyle and 100 breaststroke) and Zihan Su (200 IM and 100 freestyle) as well as all three relays.
The second meet was on Jan. 17 at McKeesport High School. The Fox Chapel girls won 85-77 and the boys won 72-37.
First place finishes were Maura Clark (200 free, 100 back), Sterrett (200 free), Dante Cordaro (200 IM), Mucci (50 free, 100 breaststroke), Travis Eckman (50 free), Adlai Nelson (100 fly), Ryan Foster (100 fly), Beasley (100 free), Alexis Boyd (500 free), Konrad Urban (500 free), Cagley (100 back), and Zihan Su (100 breaststroke). WPIAL cuts were made by Maura Clark in the 200 free and Alexis Boyd in the 500 freestyle.
Marty Stewart is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-782-2123 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.