The Fox Chapel swim team traveled to Bethel Park on Jan. 29 and came home with a split.
The girls won, 94-92. The boys lost by 98-83.
Scott Sterrett set a new Bethel Park pool record in the 200 individual with a time of 1:58.60. Noah Cagley won the 100 butterfly and Ryan Foster qualified for the WPIALs in the 100 backstroke.
For the girls, Sia Beasley won the 200 freestyle and the 100 backstroke. Franny Dean took first in the 100 breaststroke and Anna Mucci won the 100 butterfly. The 200 medley and 400 freestyle relay teams also won. Kelly Arel qualified for the WPIALs in the 200 freestyle.
Jan. 31 was Senior Night and the Foxes hosted Woodland Hills. Seniors on the squad are team manager Abby Barnes, Alexis Boyd, Claire McCarthy, Anna Mucci, Amanda Todd, David Ahn, Travis Eckman, Ryan Foster, Jake Gerger, Taj Singh, Scott Sterrett and Zihan Su.
The FC girls won 95-75 and the boys picked up a 96-74 win.
For the girls, Beasly won in the 100 breaststroke. Maura Clark won the 200 individual medley, Anna Mucci won the 100 freestyle, Amanda Todd won the 100 backstroke and the 200 medley relay team won.
Boys winners were Cagley in the 200 individual medley, Foster in the 200 freestyle, Gerger in the 100 butterfly, Sterrett in the 100 breaststroke and Zihan Su in the 100 freestyle. The 200 free and medley relay teams also notched wins while Cagley qualified for WPIALs in the 100 breaststroke. He has now qualified for all eight events.
The divers also performed well as Miranda Simon, Emily Eames and Addison Lynch each scored over 200 points.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.