Share This Page

Connellsville, Laurel Highlands swimmers win tri-meets

| Tuesday, Feb. 12, 2013, 10:48 p.m.
Connellsville swimmer Rachel Barczyk takes a breath in the 200 freestyle during Tuesday's meet. Lori Padilla/For the Daily Courier

Normally, the annual tri-meet between the Connellsville, Laurel Highlands and Uniontown swim teams is held at the beginning of the winter sports season and offers the athletes a chance to compete after weeks of training and conditioning.

This year, the meet, held at Connellsville, came at the end of the regular season and served as a type of tuneup, especially for the swimmers and divers who will be taking part in the WPIAL championships later this month.

When it was over, all three teams were satisfied with their collective performances. Connellsville won the girls meet with 102 points, followed by Uniontown (79) and Laurel Highlands (56).

Laurel Highlands earned the win in the boys meet with 103 points, followed by Connellsville (81) and Uniontown (31).

“I thought we did really well,” Connellsville coach Marie Nedley said about her girls team. “We had some really great times and had two new WPIAL qualifiers.”

The Falcons came into the meet with eight swimmers having already posted WPIAL qualifying marks. They added Lauren Urie to the list as she qualified as part of the 200 medley relay. Alyson Urie also added the 200 individual medley to her list of qualifying events, which includes two relays and two individual events.

Coming away with a win was important for the Connellsville girls team, especially considering it was against the two other Fayette County programs.

“It's really great, and it gives the WPIAL (qualifying) kids a better attitude going into the championships,” Nedley said.

Rachel Barczyk finished first in the 200 freestyle (2:08.50) and the 500 freestyle (5:45.18). Barczyk, Sierra Emert, Leah Lilley and Alyson Urie won the 400 freestyle relay (4:03.28). Alyson Urie was first in the 200 IM (2:21.30). Kait Nedrow finished first in diving with 208.9 points.

Laurel Highlands' Mackenzie Robatin won the 100 backstroke (1:04.99) and the 100 butterfly (1:03.59) and Emily Yarish was first in the 100 freestyle (54.40) and 100 breaststroke (1:10.05). Brooke Mansberry won the 50 freestyle (26.06). Robatin, Yarish, Mansberry and Chloe Faris finished first in the 200 medley relay (1:58.52).

Alexandra Meadows, Torie Miller, Christina Homer and Elizabeth Klingensmith won the 200 medley relay (1:54.61) for Uniontown.

Laurel Highlands dominated the boys race, taking first in nine of the 11 events.

“I thought we did well,” coach Ed Yauger said. “We dropped times and had personal bests. I'm pleased with it.”

The Mustangs' Justin Kostelnik won the 200 IM (2:02.33) and 500 freestyle (4:56.89). Logan Knoyer was first in the 200 freestyle (1:53.56) and the 100 butterfly (57.30) and Lucas Thomas won the 100 free (54.13) and the 50 free (24.05). Jacob Hughes was first in the 100 backstroke (1:03.50). Hughes, Thomas, Kostelnik and Knoyer won the 200 medley relay (1:50.28) and the 200 free relay (1:35.15).

Laurel Highlands will have eight boys and five girls competing at WPIALs.

Connellsville's Shane Beneke was first in the 100 breaststroke (1:07.77). Beneke, Collin Mastowski, Jimmy Manges and Travis Patterson won the 400 freestyle relay (3:59.42).

Uniontown had no winners in the boys race, but there are five girls and two boys who will represent the school at WPIALs.

“This is the first time we swam this meet at the end of the season, and this sets us up (for WPIALs),” Uniontown coach April Dowling said.

Jason Black is the local sports editor of the Daily Courier. He can be reached at jblack@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.